English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

23 answers

They're the children of an animated lump of clay and a rib; incest isn't the biggest problem here.

2007-11-28 09:02:31 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Of course, but bear in mind that Adam and Eve were absolutely perfect - they were the first humans, they were in Gods image. So their children would have been perfect too and had no incestuous diseases to pass on. Its the further away we get from Adam and Eve that we get more problems which is why later on in the bible God says through Moses that it is wrong to have incestuous relations.

2007-11-28 17:04:56 · answer #2 · answered by floppity 7 · 2 1

Would it bother you if you knew that the first viable mutations that became human beings were also siblings and were only able to procreate with one another? If that doesn't bother you, then why would it bother you to know that 56 children that most likely did not grow up with the closeness that today's families share could have possibly had children together?

2007-11-28 17:03:19 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

NO! NO INCEST.

These are to near to perfection, even after sin, they will live near to 1000 yrs in the life sustaining earth that will end with the flood year 1656.
Abraham will get the Promised Land covenant 427 years later.
Moses will be at Exodus 430 years later, then in two years, year 2515, as dwarfs and giants and hunchbacks are being born, the genetic defect gives need for incest laws.
The law of the land and the laws of God are given in 40 years to 603,550
heirs to be law keepers, givers, and law enforcers, year 2553 and there was none before Moses.

2007-11-29 05:04:44 · answer #4 · answered by jeni 7 · 0 1

Isn't it stupid to apply 21st century rules on the children of Adam and Eve. Whom do you think they should have married?

Every time Eve delivered children, God gave Eve twins (a boy and a girl). We don't know how many children she delivered total.

The rule God made for marriages of Adam and Eve's children was that brother and sister born as twins could not marry each other. But a boy and a girl of one set of twins was allowed to marry with any boy or girl of another set of twins.

Accoding to the Law God gave them, if a boy and a girl of one set of twins married with each other then it would have been considered sin of incest .

2007-11-28 17:34:08 · answer #5 · answered by majeed3245 7 · 0 1

56? where did that number come from?
Eve probably had children for 700 years or more. Maybe Twins or triplets, maybe even whole liters- no one knows.

2007-11-28 17:03:55 · answer #6 · answered by Higgy Baby 7 · 0 0

as far as I know they only had 3 children. Abel, Cain, and Seth. Wher does it say they has 56 children?

2007-11-29 06:31:24 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Yes

2007-11-28 17:03:07 · answer #8 · answered by Presagio 4 · 1 0

majeed 32 are they not still incestuous when did the rules change

2007-11-28 17:52:50 · answer #9 · answered by lucie c 2 · 0 0

As far I I knew and remember Their child was only Abel and Cain

2007-11-28 17:11:14 · answer #10 · answered by sweetie29 6 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers