Because they are not aware of how important their part is when it comes to local government.
I said this yesterday, Serving on JD is your chance to make a difference in your community. Cases that are seen are anything from Business fraud, child molesters, rape, and it is how they are treated by the judicial system that most people make their judgments calls.....BUT,..if you choose to NOT do your civic duty, you have lost your right to complain and btich. Most cases don't even go to trial, and you are still paid just for showing up.
I'm sure that should any of the whiners end up being in need of a fair and impartial jury, they would think twice about what they ducked out on.
It is no big deal...if you truly can't afford the lost work day, you have the chance to explain that. I know of many Moms who have families who did not shirk their duty....LOL in fact, it was a break from home that they ended up enjoying...imagine the peace and quiet to finally read the news, a book a magazine w.o the kids clamoring....
You know all those people that get pissed when people 'get of lightly'? Well maybe next time you'll serve.
I look forward to the next time I get called.
SIDENOTE: As for the pay, it some get reimbursement, some don't...depends on where you live. As for making more money, that doesn't work either, cuz then you have people in it for the cash, and then the system goes all wonky, worse then it is.
2007-11-29 02:43:31
·
answer #1
·
answered by Tira A 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
From what I have seen in the "real world", most cases DON'T go to juries because the juries would be pissed off about having to try a case. The defense lawyer thinks the person would be better off with either a plea or judge-only trial. Also, the days of people just hanging around scarfing up donuts and coffee are gone, they are often just on a call basis. Third, a jury of your "peers" is ancient history. You certainly did not see OJ Simpson's trial being decided by a jury of professional football players! BTW, I've been in this county for over 40 years, owned property for over 30, had a license for over 45 years, and NEVER have been called.
2007-11-28 06:45:10
·
answer #2
·
answered by cattbarf 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
I am not sure I want to be judged by 12 people that were not smart enough to figure out how to get out of jury duty :)
People want out for many reasons:
1. Many jobs don't pay while on jury duty. Some people would be financial destroyed by a 4 week trial.
2. Jury duty can be mind-numbingly boring. I had a job that paid during jury duty and I thought jury duty would be interesting. It was very boring. Four days, literally an hour of testimony.
2007-11-28 06:39:41
·
answer #3
·
answered by davidmi711 7
·
4⤊
0⤋
Yes, I would want to be judged by a jury of my peers. Although I would likely find jury duty to be fullfilling and interesting, and my civic duty, it would also be a major pain in the fanny. Time away from work, plus travel to a county seat (where courthouses are generally located)- in large metro areas, can be hellish for many people. Just trying to find parking can be a nightmare if there is little or no public transportation. So the ideal is wonderful, the reality, less so.
2007-11-28 06:42:18
·
answer #4
·
answered by GEEGEE 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Probably because:
1) You always seem to get called at an inopportune time (I served last week---Yuk, Thanksgiving week was bad)
2) You have to listen to lawyers all day long. Remember, they are not seeking the truth, they are seeking to win their case.
3) Civil case juries are a particular abuse. This is one of my #1 beefs about the U.S. justice system. If a civil case is filed, the Judge should appoint an investigator to marshall the facts and file a report. Any trial thereafter would be to challenge the findings, with the Court, not a jury, deciding, with the burden on the challenging paraty.
2007-11-28 06:44:03
·
answer #5
·
answered by LoneStar 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
no could rigidity approximately questions, as you would be under oath and for this reason required to tell the actuality... as much as achievable. mendacity could be a offender offense. the variety of questions tend to be somewhat regularly used in the previous each little thing, and since the selection technique maintains get greater particular to the ingredient you are able to in basic terms approximately tell what the case is approximately. What the legal experts are truly after is jurors who might furnish a good determination. maximum each physique isn't chosen subsequently. I even have not often been looked at two times in the process the selection technique interior the unlikely experience you're chosen those worried will do all they are in a position to that may well be useful you already know the various training and duties of a juror. that's going to be maximum tutorial in spite of everything! Have a reliable jury accountability fellow citizen.
2016-10-02 04:57:35
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
You may be true, but most systems to take care of jury duty are not effective. In most cases, you sit in a room waiting for hours without even entering a court room. If the system would change so if you report for jury duty, you actually see a trial, maybe most people would not have a problem with it. I have a busy life. I do not have time to wait in a room looking at the four wall all day. If they respect my time, I would have no problem. If not, it is a waste of time.
2007-11-28 06:43:07
·
answer #7
·
answered by Fudge Town 5
·
4⤊
0⤋
I just finished serving on a jury yesterday. It took a few days, and it was a rough case (sexual abuse of a minor), but I don't regret serving. First off, my job does reimburse me, so I'm not out any money. But I do have a job, a future, and a life. And we didn't get any donuts, just really bad coffee.
I suppose I could've gotten out of it, if I'd wanted to or lied (under oath) a bit. But you know, it's called jury DUTY. It's an absolutely, totally necessary part of our government, and if I get called again, even if it's for an equally unpleasant case, I can suck it up and do it, even if I'd rather be doing something else.
2007-11-28 12:55:32
·
answer #8
·
answered by spam_nachos 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
Well, I always get out of jury duty because I have small breastfeeding children. If I did not have small children who relied on me for care, and nourishment, I would have no problem serving. Or, if I could bring the breastfeeding baby with me, that would be fine.
When I was in college, I received one jury summons. It was during finals week, so I was excused. I would have had to fail all of my courses for the semester in order to serve. Not terribly fair, considering I had a 4.0! I told the judge I would be happy to serve during the winter break during a semester when it wasn't finals time.
My husband recieved a jury summons not too long ago. Had he served, we would have not been able to pay our utilities or buy food. He was excused. We both believe strongly in the value of a jury, but we truly would have starved had he served. His job does not offer paid time off for jury duty. We do not have any debt, but in the area we live, it is nearly impossible to get by one one salary. A week or to without pay is enough to break us.
I think that the real issue is that jurors are not offered adequate compensation. Our courthouse is about 10 miles away. With the cost of gas what it is, the "pay" would not even cover that! And, in my jursidiction, we don't get free donuts. If you were on trial, would you want to be judged by me? I would be VERY cranky that my small kids were being ignored while I was serving, that I had to forgo things like electric service to pay for the gas to get to the courthouse, etc. Sure, I could take public transportation. That takes about an hour from where I live to get to the courthouse (if I had to drip my kids off at some crappy day care, you can add another hour each way). So now we are looking at my TINY children being with some daycare center (who is going to pay for that?) for 9-11 hours a day. If you have a small income, and do not work for a government agency, it's nearly impossible to afford jury service. I don't leave my children with anyone other than my husband. I don't think it's responsible to do so (we have no realtives in the area). You;d practically have to hold a gun to my head to get me to leave them with someone else.
We need to pay jurors what they would be earning (or close to it). I know that most areas do not have a ton of extra revenue lying around, but I think that the priorities for government expenditures are out of whack. Fix the roads, pay for police and fire departments, pay jurors what they are worth, and then fund extras like community programs.
2007-11-28 06:55:50
·
answer #9
·
answered by Kellie W 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
I was psyched about having my number called for jury duty. I get some paid time away from work, get to kick it at the local courthouse with other locals doing the same thing.
I hated calling the phone number each night for my week, to see if I would make it or not though.
I'm always ready to put the smack down on some meth head, but the Mrs. works for the local police, and I know and have partied with many of the officers, along with attending weddings, babysit their kids, etc...so I was dismissed. Yeah, I got my donuts and coffee on first! :D
Pisser, as I hate meth heads and crack heads! There will be another day, but I might get dismissed again...How unfair!
2007-11-28 06:43:29
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋