I think that Victoria should be saved. She can always have more children verses taking the chance of both of them dying. So, Im on Victors side. Theres no way I would chance losing my daughter.
2007-11-28 05:40:28
·
answer #1
·
answered by Ang 3
·
5⤊
0⤋
The obvious answer would be to do the c-section to save Victoria. The baby isn't developed enough to have much of a chance of living outside of the womb. If they don't do the c-section, Victoria will die. If Victoria dies, then the baby will most likely die. So honestly no matter what is done, the baby is more than likely going to die. People need to remember that Victoria's condition is threatening the life of the baby as we speak. Any time a pregnant woman is under stress or going through any other medical problems, it directly affects the baby inside her. Victoria being left lying there in a coma is harming her baby. Nikki needs to stop being so stupid and selfish. Yes, Victoria wants to be a mother. But she can't be a mother if she is dead. So, let's just do the damn c-section and get it over with. We will just have to pray for a Christmas miracle for the baby. Even if Victoria loses this baby (which I don't think will happen) then she can make another baby. So again, people need to realize that the baby doesn't have much chance of survival no matter what happens right now. So to me there isn't anything to think about. The answer is obvious. SAVE VICTORIA!!!
2007-11-29 11:32:40
·
answer #2
·
answered by cmg1977 5
·
3⤊
0⤋
I would save my daughter! There is a chance she can have another child, and if she couldnt there is always adoption! I belive in what victor has to say and belive that nikki should just give up and let the c-section be done and over with!
Iam glad it happened though, but I think with the whole placenta abruption, that victoria wount wake up after the surgary! and that Victor and Nikki will end up raising Vicky's Son!
2007-11-30 11:43:06
·
answer #3
·
answered by ♥~Miss_Mitsubishi~♥ 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
I have no kids and have never been in a situation like this, but i dont' think i'd ever be able to give up my child. Yes Victoria has had a hard time in the past w/ having a baby, but there is def. more chances at that. AND who's to say if the baby will survive? Alot of things to think about and I hope to never be in their position!
2007-11-28 13:38:36
·
answer #4
·
answered by Mandi 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
I agree with Nikki, Victoria would probably disown her family if they saved her life over the baby! Jt probably knows it's not his kid anyway, so why would he agree to keep Brad's child alive vs Victoria?
2007-11-28 13:17:27
·
answer #5
·
answered by gurlynmgurl 4
·
2⤊
1⤋
I agree with Victor. This baby will die if Victoria dies. How is a baby going to make it when the mom is dead. This s/l is ridiculous.
2007-11-28 15:26:32
·
answer #6
·
answered by Green Eyed Girl 5
·
1⤊
2⤋
You know it's weird you ask. Because I asked myself the same question. It's off the wall huh. Hey ! Maybe there will be a Christmas miracle........... I hope I would never be in that situation . It's a ruff call.
2007-11-28 14:37:31
·
answer #7
·
answered by dreamer 2
·
3⤊
0⤋
I couldn't let my daughter die in front of me and not do anything. If they do the surgery the baby could die, if they don't do the surgery and Victoria dies....won't the baby die too?
2007-11-28 13:48:00
·
answer #8
·
answered by Loves Dogs 5
·
5⤊
0⤋
even if they deliver the baby c-section, there's no guarantee Victoria will get better... or even wake up, but if the pre-eclampsia (sp?) could put the baby at risk also
it's a tough decision - no doubt, can't see it being a win-win
2007-11-28 15:04:07
·
answer #9
·
answered by joe's wife 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
I have two daughters, there is no way that I could ever let one of my girls die that way....there could be more babies, or they could adopt...I love my girls. They could deliver that baby, and they both could live. I have seen babies smaller than that survive in today world.
2007-11-28 14:20:46
·
answer #10
·
answered by deb 7
·
4⤊
0⤋