...how the universe came about? Because after intensly searching the interwebs for an explaination on where the very first partical (whatever you want to call it) came from. I can't seem to find one scientist that can explain it. I heard a lot of talk about energies and the such, but where did these "energies" come from? Did they just poof, and they're there?
2007-11-28
04:22:23
·
17 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Society & Culture
➔ Religion & Spirituality
Only answer if you have something useful to say. Other wise your just another idiot.
2007-11-28
04:23:10 ·
update #1
I did however found this:
The very early universe
All of our understanding of the very early universe (cosmogony) is speculative. No accelerator experiments currently probe sufficiently high energies to provide insight into this period. Scenarios differ radically. Some ideas include the Hartle-Hawking initial state, string landscape, brane inflation, string gas cosmology, and the ekpyrotic universe. Some of these ideas are mutually compatible, others are not.
2007-11-28
04:26:10 ·
update #2
Dr. Zapp:
Seems like that takes a lot of faith to believe in...that it just always was
;^)
2007-11-28
04:28:34 ·
update #3
Where did the "energy" and "matter" come from, or were they just always there?
2007-11-28
04:29:43 ·
update #4
Why does it have to come from somewhere? Maybe it was always there. There is no real answer, only conjecture.
2007-11-28 04:27:50
·
answer #1
·
answered by Zappster (Deep Thunker) 6
·
4⤊
0⤋
There had been so many many much Ice Ages period in the so-called passed. The symbols eight in China represent the previous Ice Ages, of which contents so many different things group up together and which are the characters of our world. If you asking for proof, there will be some bones curveds to show symbols. The Chinese Book telling the ancient events happenned long long time ago even older than Babelon and Egypt. The bible culture telling only before christ 2000 years. The 8 symbols telling more than 20,000 years before the Dynoshaurs. These 8 symbols is now our computar theories.
Logically, our universe are a big big circle, repeat and repeat, on and on again. Everytime the repeat will have a little bit different same as our econormily circles.
As per budhaist sutras: My previous life is A who did the things resulting to me B is not fair. I am B not equal to A, but A result will carry forward to B. These are Karmas concept. Logic cannot explain this point but I know it will be. It will be.
2007-11-28 04:39:40
·
answer #2
·
answered by johnkamfailee 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
"Only answer if you have something useful to say [about this question]. Other wise your just another idiot."
This says it all really. I'm not even going to point out the spelling/grammar issues, because in light of the content of that statement they are completely irrelevant. You've just said that if someone can not satisfactorily (a very subjective term) provide a concise cosmological theory on something that the greatest scientific minds are only beginning to delve into, then they are without worth. Congratulations on insulting just about everyone on the planet, I'm sure that took some effort.
Please note that I bracketed the part I added to your statement, because that was obviously what you intended. I would've posted a recipe for Thai chicken and pasta, which is useful information, but certainly not the type for which you were pretending to search. Then again, what do I know, I'm just an idiot.
2007-11-28 05:44:45
·
answer #3
·
answered by Recreant- father of fairies 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
There is no exact answer to this singular point. Right now its the best theory we have to explain the beginning.
Try looking up the Big Crunch. It is about a new beginning which could be the before of the Big Bang.
Where did all of this come from? We don't know but in time we might. Look at what we have learned in the past 100 years. Who is to say we won't have a better understanding of where we all came from in the next 100 years?
It wouldn't be logical to say we have all the answers now. TIME as been said is important. Give it time and less faith and questioning will be needed.
Neil said this is non sense question. This is 100% a legit question.
2007-11-28 04:28:40
·
answer #4
·
answered by ItsMeTrev 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Personally, I believe in Creationism. And here is why.
Whenever I look around and see all that is beautiful in Nature, I believe that it had to be created by someone who has an eye for beauty. And the way certain things work in this world, science cannot create this beauty. The birth of a baby, it's first cry, and yes, even death. (which can be scientifically proven that our bodies break down after years).
But if God created our world, Science came afterward, because Science is a thought process first. Then there is a theory that must be proven. And most scientists cannot prove certain theories about how this world came about. Our minds are not finite like God's is, nor are we half as intelligent as Him.
I don't believe that "energies" created the earth. If they did, they had to come from somewhere. And that somewhere has to be God.
2007-11-28 04:32:27
·
answer #5
·
answered by Big Bear 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
What drives you to try so hard to get atheists to admit that they have faith in believing in "poofing"? Let me try this one more time: I don't know how the universe came into existence. I am OK with saying I don't know. I can like one theory over another based on the evidence and reasoning, but that's a far cry from blindly believing that I absolutely know that theory is true. I am OK with letting scientists take the time to do their research and open it for testing and verification. Why do you have such a huge problem with this?
2007-11-28 04:32:29
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I've read the answers and all I can see is, that I know why there is a need for a religion. Things, you can't explain are divine (like natural events for our ancestors).
As it has been explained, the knowledge of mankind is in eternal progress.
One day you will know what stuff the water was, where the spirit floated over.
2007-11-28 05:11:36
·
answer #7
·
answered by TheAlchymist 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Science does not know how everything came into existence. They are learning more and more everyday and as we become more advanced we may someday know the answer.
Because there is no answer, that does not automatically prove that by default god exists. There is no proof of a creator either. To sum it all up we know nothing and everything that we do think we know is nothing more than a hypothesis.
2007-11-28 04:33:11
·
answer #8
·
answered by Biker4Life 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
There was a very interesting show on the history channel about how the universe began. I don't remember what the name of it is but I'm sure if you scan the internet tv guide for upcoming airings you'll find it. Check it out I thought it was very educational.
2007-11-28 04:27:00
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
The problem here is that those who ask such "questions" assume they have a meaning. They do not. Follow my logic here:
1) Causality is a time bound concept, requiring a "before" (the cause) and an "after" (the effect)
2) The emergence of the universe is the emergence of space and time (this word is important -time)
3) Your question amounts to asking "what caused the universe?", which attempts to apply the concept of causality outside of universe, and thus outside of space and time. But, again, causality has no meaning outside of time.
Thus, the question is nonsense.
2007-11-28 04:35:02
·
answer #10
·
answered by neil s 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
All things arise due to causes and conditions, are changing and impermanent. "Nothing" cannot logically exist since everything, including thoughts and concepts, arise from causes and conditions. It's illogical to say that something came from "nothing".
The bottom line is that how it came about is pretty much moot, unless you're a scientist, because the past is the past and you should be more focused on the NOW, where you can cultivate altruism, wisdom and compassion and other virtuous deeds, thereby causing others and yourself happiness.
_()_
2007-11-28 04:28:02
·
answer #11
·
answered by vinslave 7
·
1⤊
2⤋