Well... it's a good source of protein :0)
2007-11-27 23:15:16
·
answer #1
·
answered by Amanda M 2
·
5⤊
1⤋
The creation week was same as the week today. God hence created Adam and Eve on the 6th day of the week. Man(creation) was God,s crown of glory in creation, because only man was made in God,s image. Obviously God had in mind that he was going to create Eve for Adam, and he chose to do it how he chose in His creation plan. You may find more answers at amazing discoveries.org
2007-11-28 09:13:10
·
answer #2
·
answered by westernwallaby784 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
First of all, we can`t understant the real scope of everything in these world. We can only see and then to anticipate a little portion of answer from a big answer.
The God know very well why he put the testicoles in man. But man don`t and because of that we easily decide that they are there only for our pleasure.
Can you answer me for what are the testicoles for a infant child? A infant child is like Adam. Has everithing but not to use imediately and only after puberty.
So my answer is that God decide when create the Adam to let him to reproduct. Remember that man has X and Y. Has both man and women gens.
2007-11-28 07:23:43
·
answer #3
·
answered by krabul 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
You know this will probably be the most read question on the board, even if people don't answer it! I know I had to look.
This raises another question about Eve. Did God know he was going to make her, or was it a decision he made on the spur of the moment? I think I will ask it!
2007-11-28 07:21:07
·
answer #4
·
answered by in a handbasket 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
I'm sorry, but I can't get passed the idea of women being made from a rib, I can't stop laughing at that. How can I possibly answer your question?
2007-11-28 07:57:13
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
It was nice for masturbation ejaculation.
How do you know he had sperm before Eve was created?
2007-11-28 07:17:15
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Your premise is wrong so it is hard to answer your question.
Man did evolve over time, according to the Bible. Remember Adam lived to be 930 years old, his son Seth died at age 912, etc.(Genesis 5) - then by the time of the flood (Genesis 6), man was living only to around age 120.
Clearly - with this huge variance in life expectancy, early man was evolving.
2007-11-28 07:20:26
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
4⤋
The thing is, the Bible is rubbish, as are all religious scriptures, so try not to analyse it too much. You'll never get anything logical out of the Bible, and I challenge anyone who can to let me know.
2007-11-28 07:18:01
·
answer #8
·
answered by Bonnie 4
·
6⤊
2⤋
well since "sperm" was probably not understood at the time, the early storytellers must of left that detail out.
2007-11-28 07:15:44
·
answer #9
·
answered by smckech1972 4
·
6⤊
0⤋
It gave Adam something to do with his hands!
2007-11-28 07:15:13
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
1⤋