The Human Mind?

Question

Don't delete this because it looks weird. Believe it or not, you can read it.

I cdnuolt blveiee taht I cluod aulaclty uesdnatnrd waht I was rdgnieg. The
phaonmneal pweor of the hmuan mnid -- aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at
Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer inwaht oredr the ltteers in a wrod
are, the olny iprmoatnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be in the
rghit pclae. The rset can be a taotl mses and you can sitll raed it
wouthit a porbelm.

Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but
the wrod as a wlohe. Amzanig huh? Yaeh and I awlyas thought slpeling was
important.

Tell if u can read it
Star if you like
Ty

this is not the first time i saw this just thought some people on answers might want to see

Answer 1

weeeeeeee no more spelling tests for me =)

Answer 2

It is really a good question. If man's mind is nothing but an "evolved" animal mind then why should we even be able to seek to know truth? (Alvin Plantega - philosopher at Notre Dame, retired - has written on this subject. Also, see the work of J. P. Moreland and William Lane Craig.) The difference between the animal mind and the human mind is not just in degree, but in kind. The human mind as the ability to evaluate and choose; to think in abstracts (symbols and mathematics); to design and create in multiple levels of complexity; is aware of time and of the limits of life; can ponder death and its implications. Humanity is the only moral and spiritual animal. All of which reflects its essence and creation.

Answer 3

There are psychological principles at work here. We can generally correlate anything based on partial information. Its what allows us to understand that if we see a shadow of something we can usually tell what it is a shadow of based on shape and relative distribution. The same thing happens in this case. There is enough of a picture (in this case each word is a "picture") to allow us to make a meaningful whole based on context and relative structure. So its not that we are "reading the word as a whole" but rather we are piecing together a whole into something meaningful.

Answer 4

I've seen it before on TV but I think it depends on the context of the word and how you arrange the middle letters, for example, sriserpud and sruicety are valid words but I know I wouldn't get them straight away if I'd just read them a moment ago.

Answer 5

Funny! 10!

Answer 6

Seen it so many times. Lost a lot of interest in it. I'll give you a star anyways.

Answer 7

i can read it, pretty weird indeed

aewsmoe ti lokos hrad btu esay ta het smea tiem

Answer 8

I culod raed it wtih prfect aese!

Answer 9

yeppers...pretty kewl....ive had that on my own site a few times in the past five years or so....You mean this is the first time you saw it?????????? lol! :)

Answer 10

haha thats sooooo awesome