English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

why aren´t these people dead yet.come on they have evadence against them these people need to rot in hell.i can not belive there are people doing this.and they try to say that was not a hate crime.bull.just because she dated one does not mean the other people were not racist.and why didn´t i ever see this on the news.

2007-11-27 08:14:37 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

http://www.crimelibrary.com/news/original/0507/0301_channon_christian.html.html

2007-11-27 08:24:29 · update #1

http://www.snopes.com/politics/crime/newsom.asp

2007-11-27 08:27:43 · update #2

look at the second one

2007-11-27 08:28:20 · update #3

i don´t care if it was a hate crime or not.what they did was wrong and you sound like you are making excuse´s for them

2007-11-27 08:32:50 · update #4

and just because they can´t prove that it was not a hate crime does not mean it wasen´t.and this is america so i have my opinion.so back off

2007-11-27 17:33:28 · update #5

4 answers

Yes, I have heard of these murders. The murder supposedly didn't get national attention from the media because the victims were white and the murderers are black.
It was sad news and unfortunately people are murdered ever day. Some cases are in the national news some are not.

2007-11-27 08:24:29 · answer #1 · answered by cc 3 · 1 0

There is no evidence of a race crime!

In fact Christian's father (addressed those who are using his daughter's death to suit their own agenda) appeared ambivalent, stating "[the crime] ain't about you."

The national news media was initially criticized by some for not giving the crime adequate coverage because the victims were white, and the suspects black, but some commentators have explained that "as bad as this crime is, the apparent absence of any interest group involvement or any other 'angle' might also explain the lack of coverage." This criticism was also fueled by erroneous reports of dismemberment, mutilations, and the duration of Christian's rapes allegedly committed by the suspects, especially in early reports.Most of the original reports were later denied by the District Attorney, along with misinformation reported from a federal deputy in the arresting state of Kentucky shortly after the suspects were apprehended

Yes, they are guilty but you're presuming something that there is no evidence for.

EDIT: DON'T BE STUPID, I'M NOT MAKING EXCUSES FOR THEM. THEY WILL BE CONVICTED AND SENTENCED, AS THEY SHOULD BE BUT YOU ARE TRYING TO CREATE TROUBLE BY CITING RACIAL ISSUES. ALSO IF YOU'D READ "SNOPES" FURTHER YOU WOULD HAVE SEEN THAT THE INITIAL REPORTS HAVE BEEN PROVEN FALSE. AGAIN PROVING MY POINT THAT PEOPLE HAVE HIJACKED THIS HORRIFIC CRIME FOR THEIR OWN CAUSES!

2007-11-27 08:24:43 · answer #2 · answered by TriciaG28 (Bean na h-Éireann) 6 · 0 1

Give us a link.

2007-11-27 08:18:11 · answer #3 · answered by S K 7 · 0 1

No I haven't.
Do you have a link?

2007-11-27 08:17:50 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers