I need initials and agree or disagree.
Thank you!
its school work.
2007-11-27 08:04:12 · 19 answers · asked by i_love_the_astros21 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
It was and still is necessary. This is comming from someone who has been there twice. Because this is only a agree or disagree subject I will leave it at that. If you want my reasoning behind it feel free to ask me.
2007-11-27 10:11:10 · answer #1 · answered by tool 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the war in iraq was simply not necessary. That isnt even an opinion its a fact. Why did we invade iraq? Ill tell you, to find weapons of mass destruction. We went there conquered the country and what did we find? we found a dictator who was really bad to his people but what didnt we find? Weapons of mass desruction... therefore the whole war WAS NOT NECESSARY. If we didnt go in there, yes saddam would still be in power with NO WEAPONS. If anyone thinks this war was necessary i would really like them to explain their reasoning. BCM
2007-11-27 16:18:46 · answer #2 · answered by bmetzger1988 3 · 1⤊ 3⤋
all the great powers through history have been making wars in order to support their interests, from Athens in ancient Greece to the USA today. Oil is source of power today and it is for the interest of the US to control the countries which produce it. from this point of view the war in Iraq is normal and expected. if someone believes that the war is necesary in order to save the poor people of Iraq from a tyran is either stupid or below 5 years of age.
2007-11-27 16:12:48 · answer #3 · answered by psc14 1 · 2⤊ 3⤋
No. The war in Iraq is not necessary. I disagree. SC
2007-11-27 16:11:49 · answer #4 · answered by Unsub29 7 · 1⤊ 3⤋
i think the originl war was worth it, but they should have pulled out as soon as we caught saddam. but now we have been there to long so we have to stay. i spent a year in baghdad and i think that we do belong there cause we are helping but the iraqis need to want to help themselves first.
2007-11-27 16:25:48 · answer #5 · answered by TDAL 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
What's the difference we are there now and need to support our troops. Let's concentrate on bringing them home safe.
KA
2007-11-27 16:25:29 · answer #6 · answered by Liberty 4 all 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
disagree. They went in looking for unclear weapons which they didnt find, so they looked like idiots, after they got saddam, they are still fighting, only for oil, besides what ever happend bin laden, we hear that they are still looking for him, but come on, you wanna find him get out of iraq and into the right country.
2007-11-27 16:13:54 · answer #7 · answered by vlad 6 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Agree, DCP
2007-11-27 17:50:49 · answer #8 · answered by DCP 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think it's absolutely unnecessary.
And I agree with "Proud Mama of 3".
2007-11-27 16:15:35 · answer #9 · answered by Misha 3 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Yes I agree it is necessary. HSF
2007-11-27 16:08:19 · answer #10 · answered by Dash 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋