This "person" answered a question on sex like this:
"Check out 1Corinthians. Paul had a problem with sex. He was probably a closet homosexual."
How "illogical". Will this person ALSO say that homosexuality was a "problem" ? Or will they...lie?
Ref:
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AqmznC8zXx5Wk1Zmrwakk7Xd7BR.;_ylv=3?qid=20071127122738AAmpX0Q
2007-11-27 07:42:48 · 8 answers · asked by JayDee 2 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
corr,
"Closeted homosexuals tend to be angry and commit acts of evil."
Interesting. Sort of helps explain why we have some the many pervesions in the "world".
2007-11-27 07:51:38 · update #1
I tend to agree with Vuk.
2007-11-27 07:53:29 · update #2
You're following, Polly.
2007-11-27 07:56:30 · update #3
skal, There IS hope for you.
2007-11-27 07:59:11 · update #4
princecurtis, EXCELLENT!
2007-11-27 08:02:47 · update #5
I believe thats a slander against Pual because they do not understand his struggles but Peter spoke in his defence. " As also in all his epistles, speaking in them of these things; In which they are hard to be understood, which they that are UNLEARNED and UNSTABLE wrest, as they do also the other scritptures, unto their own DESTRUCTION.(2 peter 3:15-16)
2007-11-27 08:00:11 · answer #1 · answered by princecurtis7 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I doubt they will lie. They were merely pointing out that Paul was a conflicted, disturbed man. Closeted homosexuals tend to be angry and commit acts of evil.
I know, I had one for a neighbor.
And why the use of random quotation marks? All it does is make your questions more annoying.
2007-11-27 15:46:49 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Paul wasn't really gay. He was a misogynistic jerk. He clearly hated women and on many occasions in his writing reminded his readers women were second class citizens. Probably due to his inability to find a woman who would marry a short tempered jerk with poor social skills.
2007-11-27 15:50:08 · answer #3 · answered by deusexmichael 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Paul had a problem with his sexuality (he preferred men to women) because he thought it was a problem. If he hadn't thought his sexuality was a problem then he wouldn't have had a problem.
OKAY, STUPID?
2007-11-27 15:53:50 · answer #4 · answered by Dolly Dewdrop 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Does this really bother you? You have to accept that most people are completely ignorant, and are merely following the status quo.
2007-11-27 15:48:53 · answer #5 · answered by Zaya the Slaya 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I like that you agree with the guy who uses the word "illeducated" [sic].
2007-11-27 15:57:45 · answer #6 · answered by Skalite 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Paul did not like women. He was probably not gay, just unhappy.
2007-11-27 15:54:10 · answer #7 · answered by magix151 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
This person who you speak of is an illeducated individual...
2007-11-27 15:52:12 · answer #8 · answered by Vuk Bronkovic 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋