2007-11-26 16:24:37 · 15 answers · asked by Vadim 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
The russian army won the war. but they didnt win freedom. freedom isnt won in wars, its agreed to by people with agreements like the constitution.
2007-11-26 16:35:23 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 6⤋
Russia, the United States, France, Great Briton, Australia, Canada, New Zealand were called the Allies. The Allies won WWII with the help of many Resistance groups, not just Russia.
2007-11-26 16:31:32 · answer #2 · answered by rnwallace07 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Russians beat the Krauts in WW2. Up until Overlord, the Germans had well over 70% of their forces facing the Russians and most of the best formations faced East. The Battles fought in the east involved millions of men and thousands of machines. The vast majority of combat casualties suffered by the Germans were suffered facing the Russians. If the Western Allies did not do Overlord, the Russians would have swept as far as Lisbon.
2007-11-26 16:40:55 · answer #3 · answered by aries_jdd 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Russia couldnt of won WW2 On its own, It was a joint effort from all of the allied forces. Russia only drove the germans out of Russia and then took Berlin. If The allied forces had been defeated then russias defeat would follow.
2007-11-26 21:55:24 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
You really want to spend the time and study the subject of WW2 more, instead of looking for quick answers on Y/A.
World War 2 was called that because many countries were involved in it and NOT just the USA & RUSSIA!!
2007-11-26 21:33:54 · answer #5 · answered by conranger1 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yeah it was a team effort, but in my humble opinion, the fate of the second world war was decided by the outcome of Operation Barbarossa.....
A decisive role was played by the USSR, USA, and Britain. THE decisive roll was played by the USSR, go ask its 20 million dead.....
Just to give you an idea of battle deaths on both sides check these out:
EASTERN FRONT:
Stalingrad: 1.8 million
Siege of Leningrad: 1.5 million
Moscow 1941-42: 700,000
Smolensk 1941: 500,000
Kiev 1941: 400,000
Vorenesh 1942: 370,000
Belarus 1941: 370,000
2nd Rzhev-Sychevka: 270,000
Caucasus 1942: 260,000
Kursk: 230,000
Lower Dnieper: 170,000
Kongsberg: 170,000
Rostov: 150,000
Budapest: 130,000
and others with less killed
Whereas on the Western Front
Battle of France 180,000
Normandy: 132,000
El Alamein: 70,000
Battle of the Bulge: 38,000
Not even on the same scale....do the math....
2007-11-26 16:36:07 · answer #6 · answered by Its not me Its u 7 · 5⤊ 0⤋
In response to your first question, the Soviet Union did the brunt of the fighting against Germany and her allies, and the Red Army captured Berlin at the end, winning.
I don't know what language the second question is in--certainly not English--so I won't attempt to respond.
2007-11-26 16:33:49 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Privet!! Russia did not win WW2 all by itself it was an allied effort headed by Russia, England and the USA. None of them could of "won" by itself. Although i do believe Russia and England would have been able to stop any nazi invasion of their countries but not without US aid in materials, ammo and planes.
Russians are tough!
2007-11-26 17:00:00 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
The Axis would not have been defeated by any single nation. Each allied nation brought something specific to the table that combined to defeat the Axis.
2007-11-26 18:37:28 · answer #9 · answered by troytxag93 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Many Germans did, some went lower back to Germany to combat for Germany incredibly of u.s.. yet yeah, they might actually connect the U. S. military lower back then, yet they of path needed to talk English.
2016-11-12 21:35:10 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ask Japan who won WW2
I bet "Russia" isnt mentioned
2007-11-26 16:32:20 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋