By the second amendment, should everybody have the right to carry a gun with a nuclear payload on it?

Question

I would love to have a gun with a ammo round filled with plutonium so if I need to defend myself, maybe government officials would get the message that nuclear proliferation is caused by the one who already has the bomb and not the one trying to afterwards acquire it.

Answer 1

Plutonium? Why?
Depleted Uranium I can understand but why would you want to have rounds that'll kill you and anyone within a reasonable distance from the weapon through radiation?

Answer 2

How deep do you want this question answered?
I have posted comments on the 2nd. amendment on many occasions since I got into this.
I have glanced over the posts posted before me,so I'll try once again to clarify some of the misconceptions.
Based on an article I read in 1993 on the legal issue of the 2nd.amendment,one of the first questions the U.S. Supreme Court had to answer after its formation was the meaning of "Militia" (pay attention please).
1. The regular army and navy: this is the regular forces on duty 24/7.
2. The guard and reserves:this is the air and national guard units under control of the individual states activated in time of national emergency or war.
3. The unorganized militia:this is the individual reserve force.
The court went on to state that all men in the U.S. were members of the militia from the age of 18 to 65 years of age.
Combat age is 18 to 45.
The individual reserve is the revolutionary war equivalent of the minuteman.
When the U.S. code (National Laws) were written in 1932,all U.S. citizens were required to own a weapon used by or could be used by the military.
Some states constitutionally require the citizens to own a firearm or pay a fee to the state for the right not to own a firearm.
When I studied the constitution in H.S.,the 2nd. amendment stated that persons convicted of certain crimes or were insane could not own firearms (built in gun control)
Even as late as 1999,the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that the individual citizen has a right to keep and bear arms for defense of life and property.
Note: The Bill of Rights applies only to U.S. citizens age 18 and up,non citizens are not protected-but as a courtesy,some constitutional protections are extended to them.
WE THE PEOPLE are the government and the governed,WE are responsible to keep the elected in line or vote them out and if the government turns its military against the citizens,it will be up to the citizens to fight back or just surrender.
I read on the internet an article that claimed Bill Clinton signed an executive order that will turn most of the U.S. military over to the United Nations.

Answer 3

Good Question!

The context of the second ammendment was the revolutionary war where civillian colonists were rebelling against the corrupt government of England. The interpreation of the second ammendment is that all men should have the right to preserve their freedoms by force (if necessary). This included the right to reject governments which were breaking the social contract (or constitution) that was agreed upon. Therefore, We SHOULD have the right to have the same weaponry as the military so that we can protect ourselves and our families from our own tyrranical governenment.

Checks and Balances.

God Bless America

Answer 4

"an incredible variety of the international locate this modification antiquated for our circumstances, in reality maximum unfastened and democratic international places do no longer enable their citizen to apply palms, they go away all to the forces of low and order." at the beginning I undertaking you to quantify this assertion. it extremely is not real. 2nd, in case you will seem around international history for the final hundred years or so which you will locate that governments have killed thousands and thousands of their very very own voters. only seem at Hitler and Stalin working example. no longer all that some time past. And greater at the instant only seem at Syria the place over 2 hundred voters have been killed by employing their very very own government. the ought to shelter your self is not often antiquated. I positioned as much as you if the 2nd modification is antiquated then so is the 1st modification. digital media the place human beings ought to spout their silly dribble ought to be limited besides so those people who're disingenuous, have hidden agendas or are outright stupid could no longer push their comments on hapless thousands and thousands of folk. and of direction as mentioned by employing multiple different, Jesus could help being armed. examine the Bible, God isn't a pacifist. do no longer delude your self into thinking he's.

Answer 5

In reading the background to the Second Amendment, the term "arms" refers to,those weapons commonly used for self-defense (ie, personal defense) - similar to what the standing armies of the time had. The intent of the 2A is to allow the people to control an oppressive government, not allow them to commit mass destruction.

Calif Deputy

Answer 6

um..... there are laws... You're retarded.

Second amendment gives the right to bear arms.... not nuclear weapons. Civilians can own any number of weapons, any number of ammunition. The only restrictions are no fully auotomatic capable weapons, and no rounds bigger than a .50 calibur round.
You still have the right to bear arms. Just nothing that can destroy a building.

Answer 7

Federal Law states the "Unorganized Militia" consists of all males 17-45. States cannot legally supersede that.

States can protect people from their own stupidity.

Sadly, that does not extend to the asking of questions.

Answer 8

Pity the Second amendment does not require Y/A question posters such as above, to have some intelligence!!

Answer 9

No, the right to bear arms can obviously be restricted in the interests of public safety. If a weapon is considered too dangerous, the government is justified in prohibiting private ownership of it and will prohibit private ownership of it. The only real debate is about which weapons are "too dangerous."

Answer 10

If you can show me a gun with a nuclear payload on it i will buy it for you.