This simply means that they can never be saved. If they continue in the state of denial of Jesus and what he has done for us their fate is sealed.
2007-11-26 12:10:15
·
answer #1
·
answered by zoril 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
Catharsis. Becoming a Christian can be a powerful conversion experience. And the Christian world-view can take a long time to let go of. Ritualized blasphemy -- such as the Blasphemy Challenge, or saying the Lord's Prayer backwards -- can have a powerful cathartic effect to help impress upon the mind of the individual that they are no longer Christian. This is really more meaningful for the ex-believer than it is for one who never believed.
2007-11-26 12:37:43
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
I think the point of blasphemy by non believers is simply to anger and irritate believers. A non believer surely wouldn't waste his words and time unless he had an offendable audience, agreed? There is no point in blasphemy in private, to an atheist. Unless of course you are talking about casually taking God's name in vain, in that case it's a cultural thing based on the fact that people don't realize what they are saying. Compare that to calling someone you don't agree with "gay". It's lost it's original definition, and is only understood correctly because of intent.
2007-11-26 12:25:04
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
i did no longer difficulty to take part yet as somebody observed i think of it replaced into based on a pair different adventure. i think of it is the thank you to spotlight that individuals who don't think are relatively area of the comparable international and that they are standard human beings. something that I looked as though it would see non secular human beings deny in many cases no longer that for the period of the past. It replaced into an techniques-set of atheists are almost nonexistent, the place they do exist they are crack whores, criminals, spouse beaters, or in detention center, and additionally there at the instant are not any 'authentic' atheists (none who do no longer pray in a foxhole or might quake on the belief of committing the supposedly unforgivable sin). So i think of on an identical time as I agree that its relatively stupid to take the blasphemy undertaking to me as i do no longer think in god no longer to point out the unforgivable act of blasphemy, i think of the marketing campaign could serve some valid purpose. Oh, yeah. i'm Mia and that i denounce the holy spirit. =>
2016-10-18 04:55:11
·
answer #4
·
answered by limson 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think the idea is to provoke God into doing something revealing. Christians often get riled about insults to God, but the big guy stays cool. Blasphemers figure if they're insulting enough, we'll find out the truth, one way or another. It's kind of a public service.
2007-11-26 12:10:56
·
answer #5
·
answered by skepsis 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
I have always thought the "blasphemy challenge" similar to those people who have the number 13 tattooed onto their arms to show that they aren't superstitious. If there wasn't some belief in the power of the number 13, why would they do it?
2007-11-26 12:11:17
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
nope it`s not possible to blaspheme something you don`t believe existent but it`s possible to piss believers off by doing so. Personally, i think that the blasphemy challenge is just for people who are desperate for attention they can`t get it anywhere else so they blaspheme to get (bad) attention from believers.
2007-11-26 12:06:26
·
answer #7
·
answered by Sir Alex 6
·
0⤊
2⤋
Of course not. This is why I find that whole Islamic cartoon controversy so odd - Islamics want to kill the cartoonist for something the cartoonists doesn't believe in. Sad.
2007-11-26 13:52:21
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Careful, you might contradict yourself.
You questioned whether it was possible to
blaspheme something nonexistent. Nonexistent
being the key word here.
2007-11-26 12:13:17
·
answer #9
·
answered by wuvie 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
1. To point out its silliness.
2. To burn a bridge.
3. To show that you do not fear it.
I don't think it's that important (plus, as usual, there are zillions of interpretations of the relevant verse) but for some people I imagine it could be cathartic.
2007-11-26 12:07:54
·
answer #10
·
answered by Doc Occam 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
if, there is in fact, a god, then it would be trivial as to whether or not you beleived in him, he would exist either way
and if you blasphemed him, you would even if you did not beleive in his existance
however, if there is no god,
it doesnt matter if you beleive in him or not, because he wont exist either way,
and there is nothing to blaspheme in the first place
and for those who struggle with a belief or disbeleif in the existance of a diety {like myself}
then it is difficult to say
2007-11-26 12:11:25
·
answer #11
·
answered by jackie41190 2
·
0⤊
1⤋