English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Have they been subjected to some clever racist sort of propaganda, aimed at shrinking the Caucasian population? If so, who would produce such propaganda and why would anyone be so foolish to take it seriously?

For instance:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/femail/article.html?in_article_id=495495&in_page_id=1879

And for comparison, a report explaining that the average number of kids per African woman is 6:
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines06/0825-02.htm

2007-11-26 10:05:07 · 6 answers · asked by VarArb 1 in Environment Other - Environment

6 answers

No - Let them go. The fewer altruist on this planet the better for us all.

2007-11-26 10:11:39 · answer #1 · answered by Dr Jello 7 · 3 3

I don't believe there is a race agenda in this, but obviously it doesn't help the western world which has a birthrate below the replacement threashold and whose leaders seem to think that massive third world immigration will solve the problem.

These women are certainly wasting their families legacies given that the third world birthrate will more than make up for the lack of children of these women. Not only that, but the societies which have the most chance to reduce the impact of humans on the environment through using technology will become less able to do this through declining population whilst the societies most likely to degrade the environment will continue to expand.

2007-11-26 10:48:19 · answer #2 · answered by cernunnicnos 6 · 1 0

I am a white collar middle class Caucasian whom chose not to have children, way back when I was poor.

This is not, and will not ever be a race issue.

I chose not to have children because I had to take care of a younger brother with down syndrome.

Back women in the USA do not have an average of 6 kids. What kind of moron came up with that?

2007-11-26 10:58:45 · answer #3 · answered by Marvin 7 · 2 0

Look I am actively fighting to limit global warming

And NO, no single group should alone take the task to stabilize the world population.

Indeed, if we could stop moslem and the evangelical Christians from speaking against birth control in Africa, the world would be a better place.

For my part as I belong to an endangered cultural group (which is not the case of Arabs, Hispanics, Chinese, Anglosaxons and co...) I won´t restrict myself from having offspring.

2007-11-26 10:35:08 · answer #4 · answered by NLBNLB 6 · 0 0

It's the new ultimate "must have" to be environmentally conscious. Your yuppie neighbors couldn't possibly outscore you in environmental awareness if you get sterilized to "Save the Earth."

Racist propaganda? Hardly. Extreme? Yes.

2007-11-26 10:17:24 · answer #5 · answered by Heather 4 · 0 2

Their logic is quite clear. We have an overpopulation problem. By not reproducing, they're not contributing to the overpopulation problem.

Your logic I can't figure out. Because African women average 6 babies each, white women should have lots of babies?

2007-11-26 10:09:27 · answer #6 · answered by Dana1981 7 · 2 4

fedest.com, questions and answers