English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

On a deserted island and had NO FOOD..just three dead people you will soon be forced to eat....(stay with me here) one was a Christian the other was a Muslim and the other was a homeless man. Who would you eat?

2007-11-26 09:58:22 · 35 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

These are great! LOL

2007-11-26 10:07:36 · update #1

35 answers

I would probably eat the Muslim; they don't eat pork or drink alcohol so the meat would probably be tasty and clean. And besides, if he was strapped to a bomb I wouldn't have to bite chunks out of him whole, just blow him up and you have Muslim souffle.

Then I would eat the homeless guy; with all the drugs and booze he has probably ingested I could get a really gnarly buzz. Kinda like dessert, you know.

I wouldn't dare eat the Christian, I would use that one to use as a raft and float back to shore. They are so full of hot air and bullshit they couldn't sink.

2007-11-27 03:41:10 · answer #1 · answered by Tuss 2 · 0 0

I wold start smoking the meat of all three to preserve it immdiately, providing that they were alive when we reached the island, after an hour or two, I'd be too worried about health issues. I'd eat the homeless person last as I'd suspect it of being more likely to have some sort of disease or parasite.

Hmmm island? There should be a better food source in the ocean than eating human meat...

2007-11-26 10:07:24 · answer #2 · answered by Pirate AM™ 7 · 2 0

well they are all dead anyway, so I don't see how their religious beliefs matter that much. The homeless guy I'd eat last because he'd probably wouldn't be as well fed and more likely to be diseased. I'd go with whoever looked the healthiest between the Muslim and the Christian.

2007-11-26 10:05:24 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Muslim, Christain then i'd save the homeless man and we'd chill and laugh over the burning bodies, and eat them with laughter.
:)

2007-11-26 10:02:00 · answer #4 · answered by pulse. 6 · 1 0

Well, the homeless fellow would be last on the menu, strictly on the basis of caloric count. As for the dining itself, it becomes strictly a matter of removing the entrails and all CNS tissue, and roasting. Bon apetite'. (A mango sauce goes well with this dish)

2007-11-26 10:05:08 · answer #5 · answered by Stephen H 5 · 1 0

Muslim first. The Christian is full of bull$hit, which would be gross and the homeless man is probably malnourished and smells like pee.

2007-11-26 10:08:09 · answer #6 · answered by FSM Raguru AM™ 5 · 3 0

The homeless man would probably be too malnourished to eat. So you would just have to decide between white meat and dark meat.

2007-11-26 10:01:37 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 4 0

I'd eat the homeless man, I hear they taste like chicken.

2007-11-26 10:02:30 · answer #8 · answered by dreamer - VT-AM 4 · 2 0

Well I would try to eat none of them. But if it was my last resort, I guess it doesn't matter which one I'd pick. I would go for the one with the most meat, I suppose.

I'm agnostic. Does it still count if I answer?

2007-11-26 10:02:10 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

Good grief, I would use the bodies (in no particular order) as bait to catch fish.

Remind me to never get caught on a deserted island with you.

2007-11-26 10:00:53 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 11 0

fedest.com, questions and answers