nuclear fission?

Question

what is YOUR opinion on nuclear fission as an energy source?

why so?

Answer 1

It is a short term answer to a pressing problem (short term being ~50-100 years)

The reason there are fewer emissions than fossil powered plants is because the emissions are tightly controlled (yes radiation and radioactive materials ARE emitted occasionally from nuclear generating plants but the amount is very minute and STRICTLY regulated). The one advantage is that radionuclides decay until they are no longer radioactive ... chemical effluents don't spontaneously decay, they stay in the environment for a long time, too.

Waste management will become a major headache and likely force fuel recycling/reprocessing eventually.

Fuel reprocessing, waste management and mining uranium ore are dirty processes (contamination)

The largest risk to the public is not plant operation but rather the transportation of radioactive materials on public highways. Transport depends on engineered physical barriers providing the only control over the loss of radioactive materials in a situation that cannot be controlled.

Plus, anything with a trefoil symbol on it could be a target for terrorists. Security is becoming a bigger issue than ever.

Answer 2

Nuclear fission is exhibited through uranium (and thorium), wherein the nucleus flies aside into 2 or greater products, and emits neutrons interior the technique. If the fission is instigated through capture of a neutron, then a sequence reaction is a threat, and skill may be produced or an explosive made. The fragments tend to be distinctly radioactive, and pose a threat to workers and kit, so specific ideas are required to construct risk-free skill reactors. Nuclear fusion is the mix of sunshine nuclei to make heavier ones, as interior the sunlight the place hydrogen atoms are mixed to make helium. the technique produces quite a few cases greater power than fission on a pound-for-pound foundation, yet won't be in a position to be set as much as be a sequence reaction as hydrogen does no longer react at temperatures under many thousands and thousands of tiers.

Answer 3

Nuclear power stations are a comparatively clean source of Electric energy, but this power source is based on Uranium, which is also a limited resource.
In addition, the use of Nuclear power has the following negative points:
- Sloppy Nuclear power stations could cause major environmental damage in case of malfunction, see the case of Chernobyl.
- Some extremist regimes use the pretext of nuclear power in order to get Nuclear bombs, and become a regional or international hazards - Iran for example, or N. Korea.
-

Answer 4

Nuclear power produces all the power we can use 24/7/365 without producing any green house gases.

We would be fools for not embracing this technology.

Answer 5

Probably necessary to stopping global warming from getting any worse (I don't know any anti-nuclear environmentalists).

It's also the safest source of power we've got so why not use it?

Answer 6

It is a very clean and long lasting resource of energy. I would use this over coal and natural gas any day.