-reducing overall consumption of gasoline & oil... is that considered global warming?

Question

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! would it contribute negatively to the environment?

Answer 1

Natural issues that have consequential effects of the
domestic livestock area include global warming. The planet could survive another 16 degrees higher heat without
any general detriment. Yet the real point is that over 40
million ethanol aligned domestic yet wild herd animals are
maintained to make ethanol. This is the situation at the
substitution of lower pollutant fuels. New engine designs
will allow lower operating costs for public spending for up
to 2000 years. That does not include the natural forming
of fuel as arranged by the natures circle member, animals.
They have habitation rules, to be safer we need to reduce
the use of automotives substantially. Between attacks of
animals, over 3200 and auto accidents over 36,000 the
irreverent use of machinery is now the issue. This part of
the report showing that in farm reserve areas furious dogs,
lions, and even sea lions is because it is built into their own
understanding what is a real environment problem. People
have to caretake the domestication of animals, and ethanol, nexonals, and halogenacals all need be managed.
People saving more for fuel costs is in competitive status.
In 2000 years an entire different fuel base will be available.
http://www.pbs.org

Answer 2

the opposite is true, reduction of the use of fossil fuels, which include, among other sources, crude oil products such as Gasoline and Oil, will contribute to the reduction of the global warming effect, by reduction in the amounts of CO2 gas that is emitted to the atmosphere as a result of burning fossil fuels. But in order for that reduction to be effective, it should be a very large reduction, even total stop of the use of crude oil products.

Answer 3

No. gas and oil don't contribute to any "global warming"