What does it mean to Atheists and Christians to find out Mitochondrial DNA has traced all humans to one woman?

Question

This one woman in Africa. How does this effect evolution and Eve?

Sorry everybody about the source, but it looks like you all have one or many of your own.

I wonder why scientists call it the Eve.... when, if you are a Christian, doesn,t Noah come into play here?

Answer 1

M/DNA has been mapped from 147 different people groups from all over the world. Test results did show that all humans came from one woman.
The part about Africa is speculation.

Actually the research was done at U.Cal. Berkeley back in the 80's by researchers Alan Wilson and Mark Stoneking. "Newsweek" published an article on it called "The Search For Adam and Eve" on 01-11-1988.
You can look the article up at Newsweek or at your local library.

Answer 2

As an atheist it doesn't mean anything to me
As someone who is interested in biology, anthropology, and paleontology it is interesting, as it would support the theory of a group migrating out of Africa. It just supports the idea that modern man arose from small bands leaving Africa

It says nothing about the male line of descent, and does not refute the idea that there could have been several out migrations.

Thats the tricky thing with genetics, you go back a few generations and we are all more closely related, but that is not the same as descended from. Those genetics companies that can tell if you are related to Ghengis Khan or Julius Caesar exploit this effect.

Answer 3

Well that isn't totally true. Mitochondrial studies only indicate that there was sufficiently small enough of a population that that the female lines all converged. It doesn't point to a single female, just a rather small population that one female happened to be the only surviving line. This is exactly what you would expect from evolution.

Second since we know the rate at which the DNA changes, we can tell about how long it would have taken to get the diversity of mutations in it. It comes out to about 150,000 -200,000 years with a nearly extinct population at about 75,000 years. This has also enabled us to date the major migrations all around the world. Again it is exactly what you would expect from evolution.

Answer 4

There's a Genetic Adam and Eve. No, they did not live while. In case you accept evolution you don't take delivery of a young earth. Maybe you are mixing YEC and the Catholic Church that accepts science? The most potent statistical examination up to now of our species' genetic hyperlinks to "mitochondrial Eve" -- the maternal ancestor of all residing humans -- confirms that she lived about 200,000 years in the past. The Rice university be trained was once founded on a part-with the aid of-part comparison of 10 human genetic units that each and every purpose to assess when Eve lived utilising an awfully distinct set of assumptions about the way humans migrated, improved and unfold throughout Earth. In human genetics, Y-chromosomal Adam (Y-MRCA) is the most latest long-established ancestor (MRCA) from whom all residing humans are descended patrilineally (tracing back handiest alongside the paternal traces of their loved ones tree). Contemporary stories file that Y-chromosomal Adam lived as early as around 142,000 years ago

Answer 5

http://www.hhmi.org/cgi-bin/askascientist/highlight.pl?kw=&file=answers%2Fgeneral%2Fans_045.html

Not much!! Because there is no way to support the theory. Yet, even if there was some truth-they call this woman in the theory EVE! hmmmmmmmmmmmm That sort of rings a bell for Muslims, Jews, and Christians. It is nothing more than a theory. We can create a theory here on line with limited facts and an educated guess or prediction--would this make it true? Nope.

Answer 6

Not quite. Mitochondrail Eve is not the common female originator of all mankind.

"The Mitochondrial Eve of 200,000 years ago (ME for short henceforth) is NOT our common ancestor, or even common genetic ancestor. She is the most-recent common ancestor of all humans alive on Earth today with respect to matrilineal descent. "
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/mitoeve.html

-----
http://www.actionbioscience.org/evolution/ingman.html
-------
"Eve had many ancestors – it helps if you think about her as an hourglass – she was the pinch in the glass through which our genes ran. There had been many more Eves before her, she is just our most recent common ancestor. There will probably be more population bottlenecks and more Mitochondrial Eves in the future."
http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/h2g2/alabaster/A703199

Answer 7

there's a Genetic Adam and Eve. No, they did no longer stay on the comparable time. in case you settle for evolution you do no longer settle for a youthful earth. according to danger you're mixing YEC and the Catholic Church that accepts technological information? the main physically powerful statistical examination thus far of our species' genetic hyperlinks to "mitochondrial Eve" -- the maternal ancestor of all residing people -- confirms that she lived approximately 200,000 years in the past. The Rice college learn substitute into according to a component-with the help of-component assessment of 10 human genetic fashions that each purpose to be certain while Eve lived making use of an fairly diverse set of assumptions with reference to the way people migrated, accelerated and unfold throughout Earth. In human genetics, Y-chromosomal Adam (Y-MRCA) is the main modern common ancestor (MRCA) from whom all residing everybody is descended patrilineally (tracing back in basic terms alongside the paternal traces of their kin tree). modern study checklist that Y-chromosomal Adam lived as early as around 142,000 years in the past

Answer 8

It depends on which scientist you choose to believe. Those who support the theory of man out of Africa believe the evidence supports that. Others do not. Many others don't hold that belief.

Answer 9

That's not what they were looking for and not quite
the result that you might have on your mind.

The reason for it was to clarify a question:

Did modern man evolve from one or from different
ancestors. The results suggests that it was one
who either originated in Africa or traveled there.

It is not a genetic trace-back to "one person".
It's a genetic trace-back to one specific group.

Answer 10

Well, obviously. All life has a common ancestor, just as all humans have a common ancestor. There's a common male ancestor as well, but he's a couple tens of thousands of years younger than the common woman.