Is your question a hoax
i can believe that easier
this question is asked every ten minutes why don`t you check them out and save 5 points
or are you looking for fellow disbelievers ,your mind already seems made up what ever any body says ,so you will vote for the person that says you are right it is all a hoax
that is too obvious
,to skeptics and deniers it is mass hysteria and figments of millions of peoples imagination .
so you got nothing to worry about
God rules America and will protect you
so it wont happen there .
However the price of beer may go up ,because of potable water shortage
and food prices may rise because the third world slave countries got lots of problems due to Global Warming.
on e degree rise in temperature means 10% crop loss-
In Chiapas ,and Tabasco in Mexico .more then a million people became homeless overnight with water coming up to their roofs ,because of rains from super evaporation from the forests,this had never happened before.
Millions of animals died and the crocodile ,who are abundant in that area were delighted.
In India 3000 people died because of super storms .
Right now the average death toll annually is 150.000 due to Global warming
a few years ago a whole bunch in France as well.
these figures are already out of date and are expected to double soon.
In Northern China millions of people are running for their lives because regular dust storms so far have buried 900 villages under the sand
and the whole of northern China is turning into a dessert.
The Sahara is growing by 7 kilometers a year all around the edges ,like a slow burning fire shriveling up their neighbors
In the Kalahari huge rivers have dried up and thousand of species are gone due to their habitats disappearing
when the north pole is gone , you may have polar bears soon in America ,looking for a home ,as the bollweavel sings.
so that is the good news you can add another specie to your list ,instead of deleting hundreds that are disappearing
the biggest changes are invisible at micro biotic levels species are becoming extinct ,others are multiplying ,this affects the insect populations that follow ,and changes in that affect all that follows in the food chains ,All life is interrelated of both flora and fauna,
And we as being on the top of the food chain are always the last to know
when they killed all the mosquito's around the Danube for example all of the life in the woods disappeared ,they were a vital link in the food change.like the disappearing bees will drastically affect pollination ,some of that is part of our food production
So Global warming has its toll there are incidents all over the world ,
for a sensible answer
Look for Trevor or Dana or bob ,they have far more patience than i have
2007-11-25 13:53:00
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
4⤋
I will never tire of posting this letter from Mr. Coleman!
Statement from Meteorologist, John Coleman,
the founder of The Weather Channel.
"It is the greatest scam in history. I am amazed, appalled and highly offended by it. Global Warming; It is a SCAM. Some dastardly scientists with environmental and political motives manipulated long term scientific data to create an illusion of rapid global warming. Other scientists of the same environmental whacko type jumped into the circle to support and broaden the “research” to further enhance the totally slanted, bogus global warming claims. Their friends in government steered huge research grants their way to keep the movement going. Soon they claimed to be a consensus.
Environmental extremists, notable politicians among them, then teamed up with movie, media and other liberal, environmentalist journalists to create this wild “scientific” scenario of the civilization threatening environmental consequences from Global Warming unless we adhere to their radical agenda. Now their ridiculous manipulated science has been accepted as fact and become a cornerstone issue for CNN, CBS, NBC, the Democratic Political Party, the Governor of California, school teachers and, in many cases, well informed but very gullible environmentally conscientious citizens. Only one reporter at ABC has been allowed to counter the Global Warming frenzy with one 15 minutes documentary segment.
I do not oppose environmentalism. I do not oppose the political positions of either party. However, Global Warming, i.e. Climate Change, is not about environmentalism or politics. It is not a religion. It is not something you “believe in.” It is science; the science of meteorology. This is my field of lifelong expertise. And I am telling you Global Warming is a nonevent, a manufactured crisis and a total scam. I say this knowing you probably won’t believe me, a mere TV weatherman, challenging a Nobel Prize, Academy Award and Emmy Award winning former Vice President of United States. So be it.
I have read dozens of scientific papers. I have talked with numerous scientists. I have studied. I have thought about it. I know I am correct. There is no run away climate change. The impact of humans on climate is not catastrophic. Our planet is not in peril. I am incensed by the incredible media glamour, the politically correct silliness and rude dismissal of counter arguments by the high priest of Global Warming.
As the temperature rises, polar ice cap melting, coastal flooding and super storm pattern all fail to occur as predicted everyone will come to realize we have been duped.
The sky is not falling. All natural cycles, drifts in climate are as much, if not more responsible for any climate changes underway. I strongly believe that the next 20 years are equally as likely to see a cooling trend as they are to see a warming trend."
2007-11-25 17:56:26
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
global warming is not a hoax. the earth is coming out of an ice age and is gradually warming. The effects of humans are accelerating this process to some degree.
2007-11-25 15:44:05
·
answer #3
·
answered by solo 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The crocodile were delighted?
It's absolutely ridiculous! There is no evidence of "climate change" because we don't have reliable data for the time it would take to determine what Climate change is. A climate is defined by 100's of years of data. The Grand Canyon wasn't formed in a day. Global change was? I know scientists have done so many studies but where is the real evidence and if you tell Al Gore's movie You are an Idiot. Don't believe everything you hear especially if its from a man who lives in a huge energy using home.
Look, it's not about the earth, it'll replenish itself; and it'll be here long after we are gone.
2007-11-25 13:53:31
·
answer #4
·
answered by MaiRose 2
·
3⤊
2⤋
I don't know much about global warming, but it seems to me that man isn't responsible. But im willing to listen to other arguments. As far as Horner being on the payroll of Exxon/Mobil, I don't know that he is, but the scientists you quote are probably on the payroll of someone like greenpeace, everyone has a salary my friends. They don't do it for free. I do know that for every scientist that says it's caused by man, another doesn't think so. That report the left always likes to quote, some of the scientits on it sued to get their names taken off of it, because they didn't agree with the summary, only the part they had written.
2016-05-25 23:06:34
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
It is a hoax in that it is not caused my human activity, and there is little we can do about it.
No two ways about it, the earth is getting slightly warmer.
But it has been warmer during human history and civilization not only survived, but thrived.
When it became warmer the last time, there was no industrialization. People did nothing to bring temperatures back down either, but they did drop.
Mars and Venus are currently experiencing a similar warming pattern to Earth. How does Al Gore explain that?
Antarctica is currently building ice mass while the Arctic is loosing it.
Al Gore's movie is filled with lies and half truths.
2007-11-25 13:46:55
·
answer #6
·
answered by CHEVICK_1776 4
·
5⤊
3⤋
There hasn't been any warming in the last 10 years even though co2 is continually being emitted into the atmosphere.
There is no connection between co2 and temperatures. This part is a hoax.
The Sun is the cause for all warmth on Earth.
2007-11-25 14:17:49
·
answer #7
·
answered by Dr Jello 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
i dont think global warming is a hoax, look at the weather patterns , and the harsher climates, its almost total extremes
when its hot , its extremely hot, and when its cold, its extremely cold, there is virtually no spring and fall anymore,
its summer or winter.
2007-11-25 14:08:25
·
answer #8
·
answered by mele 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
A lot of to do about nothing so some folks can gain political power and wealth.
2007-11-25 17:06:21
·
answer #9
·
answered by Ranger473 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
What does the equation 16/106 have to do with global warming?
With all due respect, if you don’t know the answer to that question, you don’t know the first thing (literally) about the man-made CO2 emissions theory of global warming and, accordingly, you couldn’t possibly have an informed opinion on the subject.
If you do know the answer, then you also know that it’s the only thing you really need to know about the great global warming scam.
Someone should print up a T-shirt with 16/106 on the front and back and pass them out at eco-sheep rallies. Why? Once people know that number, they may continue to parrot from the Al Gore script but their hearts are no longer in it. Why? Because 16 parts per million is the total amount of man-made CO2 in the atmosphere.
What?!?!? That’s all?!?!? Sixteen parts per million?!?!?
Once you get that number into the discussion, the “consensus of leading scientist say” argument is pretty much done, as well the credibility of the so-called academic community.
Now we could point out that the total amount of CO2 in the atmosphere is only 0.054 percent (540 parts per million) of which over 97 percent is attributable to natural sources.
We could comment on the fact that the ice core sample data presented by Al Gore in his propaganda piece actually show that CO2 content increased subsequent to (and not as a precursor of) the noted increases in temperature. Post hoc ergo propter hoc issues notwithstanding, you could correctly observe that Dr. Gore has his theoretical cause confused with his hypothetical effect.
We could bring up the fact that, in direct contraction of Dr. Gore’s claim that global warming is causing an expansion of Africa’s deserts, New Scientist is reporting that “Africa’s deserts are in spectacular retreat… making farming viable in what were some of the most arid parts of Africa”.
We could cite the fact that, again, in direct contradiction of Dr. Gore’s claim that Greenland is in rapid meltdown, the Journal of Glaciology reports that “the Greenland ice sheet is thinning at the margins and growing inland with a small overall mass gain” and that the Danish Meteorological Institute now reports that the past two decades were the coldest for Greenland since the 1910s.
We could assert that, again, in direct contradiction of Dr. Gore’s claim that the Antarctic ice sheet is melting because of global warming, satellite measurements of the Antarctic ice sheet actually show significant growth between 1992 and 2003.
We could observe that, again, in direct contradiction to Dr. Gore’s claim that Himalayan glaciers are shrinking due to global warming, the American Meteorological Society’s Journal of Climate is now reporting that, “Glaciers are growing in the Himalayan Mountains, confounding global warming alarmists who recently claimed the glaciers were shrinking and that global warming was to blame.”
We could mention the fact that changes in solar activity not only correlate perfectly with observed climate changes on Earth but on the other planets of our solar system as well. Yes, Mars is showing signs of warming and neither John Travolta nor Virgin Atlantic has yet to land a single jet there.
We could reference the fact that global temperatures actually declined during the first four decades of the post-World War II industrial expansion and that three-fourths of the global warming measured in this century occurred during the relatively low carbon emissions era of 1900 to 1940.
We could get into the most salient fact that surface temperature readings have increased faster than their correspondent tropospheric readings which is in direct contradiction to the man-made carbon emissions theory of global warming. For any other theory of the physical universe, this alone would be enough for a consensus of scientists to say, “Hey, wait a minute. This hypothesis does not fit the observable facts. We need a new theory.” But with global warming, the sad fact is that there are just too many grant dollars at stake for the consensus to rediscover their integrity… and so the charade continues.
But dig this.
We could even note that the accepted global average temperature statistics used by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change show no increase in surface temperatures since 1998. What!? By the IPCC’s own definition global warming stopped in 1998?!
Yes, we could confront the global warming scammers with all of these facts and more but most (if not all) of these arguments are simply too complex for the average government school indoctrinated eco-zealot to grasp.
So just lay up that 16 parts per million number and let it sink in.
Need something to help you put 16 parts per million into some sort of context?
The average chicken dinner contains between 33 and 43 parts per million of arsenic. That’s more than twice as much poison in your KFC as man-made CO2 in the atmosphere.
The Al Gore theory of global warming is a scam to promote nuclear power, expand the scope of government, increase academic welfare, tax every bit of energy productive people use, derail third world development and create unearned fortunes via a government-mandated carbon credits market… all based on the bizarre notion that reducing man-made CO2 content from 16 parts per million down to say 12 parts per million is going to counteract the power of the sun.
Yes, there really is a sucker born every minute.
2007-11-26 10:34:36
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋