Its not just people like Al Gore that have so many houses and cars. 90% of the USA doesn't really care about global warming and those issues. We are to much of a selfish slobish nation, we are to worried about what we look like or if the things we have are better than others. For most people its not an ideal or a belief its just a fad to be environmentally friendly.
2007-11-25 12:47:33
·
answer #1
·
answered by Kristyon 2
·
2⤊
3⤋
a million. No. although a stable deal comes from that source the quantity of hydrocarbons (which we make contributions) has larger to way greater suitable than organic materials. 2. confident, lots additionally comes from vegetation (rice is a contributor to methane launch) and there are wallet under the sea that still upload to the quantity of gas. 3. No. If something it has fluctuated. there replaced right into a sprint ice age that lasted some 4 hundred years that ended on the time the commercial revolution began. 4. no longer as much as human beings think of yet that's no longer the element. As third international countries industrialize the contributions will advance logarithmically. by using fact the U.S. is likely one in all the biggest individuals we may lead the international in option strategies of power use. 5.No. Al Gore replaced into continuously obsessed with this problem and the popularity of his documentary has greater to do with human beings starting to know the priority and much less from his celebrity.
2016-10-18 03:03:49
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
He is in it strictly for financial gain when somebody asks about his hypocrisy he puts forth some token effort as claim he is trying. Not one mansion has he,, more like three or four.
He buys the Carbon credits he claims equalizes his conspicuous consumption from his own Carbon trading Company (for the one house). The contributions he brags about like the million for the Nobel went to the Alliance for Climate protection, his own creation for which he gets paid to chair.
A Big faker. Let it be known that when the rich elite Eco Evangelists practice what they preach you may consider it also.
Sadly Al gore is not the only bad example that would you have you live a third world existence while he parties on.
2007-11-25 11:30:21
·
answer #3
·
answered by vladoviking 5
·
4⤊
3⤋
Al Gore's Big House
Poor Al Gore. Critics of his environmental campaign are calling his Greek Revival style home in Belle Meade area of Nashville, Tennessee a McMansion. Some architects were noisily grumpy when Gore was hired to give a keynote presentation at this year's AIA convention.
The stone-throwing turned fierce in February when a small conservative group, the Tennessee Center for Policy Research, issued this press release: Al Gore’s Personal Energy Use Is His Own “Inconvenient Truth”. The group claimed that Gore's 10,000-square-foot home uses 20 times as much electricity as the average American home.
Gore's defenders have been quick to point out that Gore balances out 100% of his electricity use by purchasing energy from renewable sources such as solar, wind, and methane gas. He also invests heavily in projects that help reduce energy consumption. And besides, defenders ask, isn't Gore's message about global warming too important to quibble about his electric bill?
Environmentally-conscious building design was the theme of this year's AIA convention. Despite the naysayers, Al Gore's speech received thunderous applause from an audience of several thousand architects, according to this report in San Antonio Express-News: Gore sees 'spiritual crisis' in warming.
2007-11-25 11:00:51
·
answer #4
·
answered by jon_mac_usa_007 7
·
2⤊
4⤋
AL gore is a hypocrite. He hurts peopl trying to prevent global warming while trying to help it. This is because when people see his house and cars and planes, they say "hes a bi supporter and he doest even do it, so why should I , even if there are plenty of credible people who say it is real.
2007-11-25 11:01:38
·
answer #5
·
answered by savage708 3
·
6⤊
2⤋
What kind of stupid argument is that. Who cares where he lives. He is trying to bring awareness to an issue that will affect whether this planet survives beyond another century or two and you bring up something idiotic like that?
Yeah, I'm sure once the momentum gets going, people will tear down their houses and build nice solar powered ones, but I wouldn't go burning any bridges just yet.
How about starting with TODAY and doing it right from hereon in, and perhaps eventually, things will change one day at a time, one person at a time. Baby steps is how we all learned to first walk kiddo.
You know he could be just another rich prick who sits at home stuffing his face and saying screw you. At least he is bringing awareness to a very REAL cause.
You kids ought to go to the library or use your computer to do a little research for a change because all I hear is blah, blah, blah.
2007-11-25 11:23:36
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
5⤋
Absolutely no different from the televangelist who does his secretary.
Except that the evangelist actually shows contrition, while ol' Al buys "carbon credits" from the sham company (Generation Investment Management) of which he's a Principal.
2007-11-25 11:24:10
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
3⤋
I think this goes back to the old saying, " do as I say, not as I do". This just another example of the rich being exempt from what the common citizen is required to do.
2007-11-25 10:57:24
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
1⤋
Because they're hypocritical assholes who will cater for whatever the public wants to hear. They're like puppets of society, people who are there to reassure, safe in the knowledge that even though they may believe in what they are preaching, they likely will not practise it.
2007-11-25 10:59:39
·
answer #9
·
answered by Chris 3
·
6⤊
2⤋
See, you just don't get it. Algore cares, so YOU have to move into a smaller home, smaller car, smaller lights.
He needs big homes, big planes so he can cater to the Hollywood and big money types so show them how much he really cares. This way he gets more money to tell you how much more you need to do to "save" the planet.
2007-11-25 10:59:27
·
answer #10
·
answered by Dr Jello 7
·
7⤊
2⤋