English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

If a descendant of a native American, who was born in the part of America that is now called Mexico, were to cross the border into the United States would you consider him to be an “illegal immigrant?” Would he consider “you” to be am illegal immigrant?

2007-11-25 09:15:07 · 15 answers · asked by waynesworldstage 2 in Politics & Government Immigration

15 answers

I'm as American as American gets. Not only is most of my family not illegal, we aren't even immigrants. Most of us were born here.
100% American and nobody can ever tell me different.

2007-11-25 09:23:53 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3 2

Whoa. How many times does this have to be explained. Illegal is illegal. I don't care if you were a native American on the border. You are illegal if you are not an American citizen. Stay in Mexico where you belong. We don't want you here,.

2007-11-25 18:55:23 · answer #2 · answered by Robert J 6 · 0 1

And your answer is we rule the land now and I think that is all that matters !? Did or did not native americans live in Mexico and canada . I Sorry to say they lost there land but that is the concept of war and weakness of life !

2007-11-25 18:39:18 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

OK, sure. But what about the rights of the people who crossed the Bering Straits land bridge into the Americas before that. If we follow your thinking, then the whole continent belongs to the Russians. Right?

2007-11-25 17:21:54 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

each country deals with aliens in different ways. At the moment the UK is very strict when it comes to immigration. I think the US has a good balance and better than the UK in this respect.

2007-11-25 17:31:14 · answer #5 · answered by j_emmans 6 · 1 0

no, your in mexico, not the US. The evil white man has been here in US territory for hundreds of years, and he your mexican coming into US territory was living elsewhere. When the evil white-men came, there were not any immigration laws. Now that there are, It's easily to say that the people that are natural born Citizens in the us are infact citizens, and the illigal isnt.

2007-11-25 17:42:22 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

It's 2007 history has explaned this a long time ago> There NO AMNESTY so it's a none issue>For the illegals>

2007-11-25 17:22:39 · answer #7 · answered by 45 auto 7 · 1 1

Use common sense. Mexico is a next door neighbor and is a 3rd world country, why you don't expect them to cross here illegally?, if Ukraine was a next door neighbor we would get a lot of illegal Ukrainians immigrants as well.

2007-11-25 17:20:12 · answer #8 · answered by Garañon 1 · 1 4

This is a retorical question. Get a life.

An ILLEGAL INVADER is someone in this ocuntry without being born here, or with out having papers stating they are residents.

2007-11-26 18:03:32 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Exactly. Personally (even though I am 3/4 European), I consider the colonists/settlers illegal immigrants of this land. Of course they would label the person a "illegal alien". They don't care about what is right. This is truly Native land, but the white man stole it. Simple as that.

2007-11-25 17:23:47 · answer #10 · answered by ga_tx_1992 4 · 1 5

fedest.com, questions and answers