Why should we pursue military options against iran?

Answer 1

we should because the fact that there muslim. the koran preaches to remove the world of anything besides muslim. either convert or kill. also the koran preaches that allah recognizes sacrifice as the most heroic thing you can do. So put the fact that iran has nukes and there muslim. sounds like a kamikaze waiting to happen. only problem b/c of this it would be very hard to defeat iran without them letting the nukes off. it would take a lot of secret forces work to locate all the nukes and prevent them from being set off. its nearly impossible but something needs to be done.

Answer 2

We shouldn't - it would be a disaster - Iran is a very different situation than Iraq. Seventy percent of the Iraqis disapprove of their President (sound familiar?) because he promised economic reform and instead concentrated on the nuclear weapons program.

If we attacked Iran it would only help that crazy Iraqi President. If we hold off it shows the Iraqis that he was wrong. People in Iraq didn't love Saddam Hussein, but the situation in Iran is different - if we invaded there the guerrilla war against us would not end until we got the heck out of there.

Answer 3

I don't think we should, but if you really want to know the arguments for war with Iran, read here.
http://www.commentarymagazine.com/printarticle.cfm?article=com.commentarymagazine.content.Article::10135
This is the best article I have read for why a war with Iran is doable and necessary.

Answer 4

for an confirmation to this question u might desire to show out that if we because of the fact united statesa. doesnt flow forward and leap in in this then israel will and then the entire center east will would be in an uproar, and we can be blamed for it. ( David C. hELWICH, study for paradigm study) . while they have nuclear weapons, not one of the sanctions we've or could have wont artwork hence protection tension action is our in basic terms determination. To negate it... Iran wont have nuclear weapons each time quickly , hence threats are exaggerated. It takes an prolonged time to make those issues so it is logically impossible for them to be making the threats that they are being accused of ,fairly because of the fact that they dont formally have nuclear weapons. There are different effective options, confident international peace is one that incorporates techniques in spite of the fact that we arent in a attractiveness pagent. in spite of the fact that dis making an investment ourselves in Iran might help us greater desirable than attacking them. at the instant the rugmarket is skyrocketing it is largely partly through embargo being lifted in 2000. issues like that could desire to be eradicated subsequently growing to be much less of our might desire to be in stable with iran. Intelligence gaps is yet another massive component to hit on, we are in basic terms working on a organic pay attention- say of the place those "nuclear weapons" are. Iran is a extensive united states, so in basic terms entering into there and attacking with effective and omit theory is obviously unwise. yet another considerable ingredient of bear in mind while debating it is that it is our government against theirs. i comprehend for a actuality that Iranian human beings for the main section love human beings, and till this is a private adventure maximum human beings have no longer something agains Iranian human beings. So the hatred we pay attention of Iranian's for us is what the government is feeding us, AND vice versa. i'm at the instant nonetheless gaining knowledge of this aswell the rest i come across i nicely enable u comprehend approximately. in case you have any questions be at liberty to touch me . stable success which comprise your debate.