http://i152.photobucket.com/albums/s195/samsung505050/GerardWayEdit.jpg
I know its not amazing or anything, but do you think its okay?
2007-11-25 08:32:34 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities ➔ Visual Arts ➔ Photography
I wasnt going for an 'unedited' look, I know you can tell its been edited, it was kind of the point.
Was the question anything about sentence phrasing? no.
2007-11-25 09:43:11 · update #1
Its not my bf lol, its Gerard Way from My Chemical Romance. =]
2007-11-25 09:43:52 · update #2
No. It's too bright now. You may have removed a spot or two on his face, but you made it too bright. Now the highlights are "blown" (lost details).
And the question should have been, "do you think I edited this photo well?"
--------------
You said, "Was the question anything about sentence phrasing? no."
Well, it reflects on you as a person. Your resume or other letters do not sound like this, I hope. Oh I forget, you're just a child.
2007-11-25 08:39:01 · answer #1 · answered by Pooky™ 7 · 5⤊ 3⤋
Depends on what result you want...if the intention is to make kind of a gothic look I think it works due to the black and white and hi-contrast, If what you wre looking for was to correct facial imperfections on the model, I think the spot healer is the best choice
2007-11-25 17:22:08 · answer #2 · answered by gnomepuppet 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
It all depends on the style you were going for.....
For a realistic look...no...you've blown out the subtle shading needed to convey a "real -unedited" look....
For a high contrast/trendy type photo, you've done a good job....though the forhead is a bit too bright....need to burn that down a little....
2007-11-25 16:57:19 · answer #3 · answered by kyten13 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Please take this as advice, not a put down. The image was better how it was. But this is what you could have done to improve it. If you remove the spots and blemishes from his face, then it would be fantastic. What you did was overexpose the face which destroyed any detail there.
Keep it up!
2007-11-26 20:36:57 · answer #4 · answered by Piano Man 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, if your intention was to leave a high contrast portrait, you did OK.
I would have removed a couple of blemishes, and just blended the rest, to leave more detail.
Keep working at it. It's the best way to learn.
2007-11-25 17:34:25 · answer #5 · answered by photoguy_ryan 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Wow, he looks like young Malcolm Mc Dowell, like in Clockwork Orange days.
I find the editing just a bit too hot, otherwise, nicely done.
2007-11-25 16:40:28 · answer #6 · answered by Perki88 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
It's okay if you are making an album cover, but not so hot for a portrait. Actually, it's "way too hot." Blown out.
2007-11-26 00:02:12 · answer #7 · answered by Picture Taker 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Depends on what you wanted to achieve.
If you wanted a dramatic, high-contrast image, you done good.
If all you wanted was to get rid of skin imperfections, you went way overboard.
2007-11-25 23:21:16 · answer #8 · answered by V2K1 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, it's a little overdone. It looks unatural. It almost looks like his skin is glowing. (not too flattering)
2007-11-25 17:16:47 · answer #9 · answered by Miss K. 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
yeah! that pic is good...its not too bright.
too bright would be a big yellow ball!
lol
yes! :)
you edited that photo very good!
2007-11-25 16:41:04 · answer #10 · answered by kayli. 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋