English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

please say why

2007-11-25 06:36:31 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Food & Drink Other - Food & Drink

6 answers

The general public likes to blame their problems on someone else.

2007-11-25 06:45:24 · answer #1 · answered by Cooking Engineer (CE) 3 · 0 0

Fried food shouldn't. You can tell if something's been fried. It's not like genetically engineered or irradiated food, where you can't tell if anything's been done to it. I think that those foods SHOULD have warning labels. I should be able to avoid those foods, if that's my choice.

2007-11-25 14:48:16 · answer #2 · answered by pisceswoman87 6 · 0 0

Very interesting. I suppose they could have. Thing is most people know what is good for them, and what is not. We all know that high calorie, and high fat or high sugar content isn't good for us, yet many continue to eat it. As with cigarettes, we all know what that means as well, yet people still smoke. I don't think putting warning labels on food is necessary. Common sense should prevail for most people, although it doesn't always. :)

2007-11-25 15:45:08 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

They really should not. But because people are stupid and refuse to take responsiblity for their own actions it has gotten to the point where you have to put a warning label on everything.

2007-11-25 16:28:43 · answer #4 · answered by rohak1212 7 · 0 0

FAT people have NO idea of discipline.
and the companies need the protection from the IDIOTIC liberal justice system....

2007-11-25 15:00:55 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Because people are stupid and still sue cigarette companies for smoking!

2007-11-25 14:43:53 · answer #6 · answered by Beau 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers