.
If science, as proposed by the 'theory' of evolution and 'big bang' that the earth is between 4 to 5 billions years old...............
and supposing that I believe that the earth is really 4 billions years old precisely, how is it that it is so poor in precision.... where did the 5 billions years come from??
That is 25% error!! Is that your precision?? Or just add another zero when somebody else liked it?!?
Psst...thought i have a change, like my avatar? Should listen to my..... a s s!
.
2007-11-24 23:30:50 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
No, I don't like your avatar - it looks more like a sheep's rear-end. Or is that what you intended?
2007-11-25 00:19:16 · answer #1 · answered by Who Else? 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
"If science, as proposed by the 'theory' of evolution and 'big bang' that the earth is between 4 to 5 billions years old"
Actually the age is determined by studying the Earth, not biology or the beginning of the Universe.
And anyway, the Earth is dated at about 4.5 billion, not 4 - 5.
2007-11-27 05:13:17 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sorry atheists & evolutionist, this is one reason you may find it difficult considering the creationist side of this issue. Ignorance and a s s e s like this. You can be a Christian and still believe in a big bang and old earth. Check out the web site below. There are intelligent answers and solutions that agree with modern science and line up with the Bible and Christianity. You don't have to chuck your brains like this guy appears to have done. Merry Christmas!
2007-11-25 07:52:58 · answer #3 · answered by Steve K 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
So maybe you're saying 6,000 years is more precise?
Then how come it takes two million years (as an example) for the light from Andromeda Galaxy to reach us?
Meaning, we see the Andromeda Galaxy as it was long before your god supposedly built the universe --
How do you people figure?
2007-11-25 07:59:01 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
That is exactly why it is referred to as a 'theory' and not 'the one true science'. All bow and hail the one true science. You believe what ever silly little thing you want. I have no issues with that.
2007-11-25 07:39:01 · answer #5 · answered by Stocky 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
if you want to get specific, tests done by analyzing the isotopes hafnium-182 and tungsten-182 have pinned the age of our planet at 4.5672 Billion years old
2007-11-25 07:38:22 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Here we go again, equating the origins of the universe to speciation.
No wonder it's called a leap of faith for believers.
2007-11-25 07:41:54 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I am really starting to despise the people who say:
"It's only a theory".. That statement.. It shows so much ignorance it makes me sick. >:(
Nincompoop!
A scientific theory is NOT just a GUESS!
2007-11-25 08:17:28 · answer #8 · answered by Andre 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Oh so where did your 6000 years come from? Come on tell us how we lived on earth with our neighbors, the dinosaurs.. Why am I even wasting my time.
2007-11-25 07:36:37 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
I'm stupid because you are imprecise? What kind of question is that? and therefore I should look at your donkey? Why don't you just say "I hate you" it'd make more sense....
2007-11-25 07:40:07 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋