I think the 700 club fundies are totally nuts. But, that's okay.....most of them are also geriatric.
2007-11-24 13:25:30
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
I bet it is a paraphrase of that ancient pronouncing: God watches over the unintelligent and the loopy. W isn't triumphant. He was once a C+ pupil, and an alcoholic. He bought into Yale given that his father went there. He was once a failure as a businessman, so he clearly went into politics, that is the shelter of the incompetent. Pat Robertson is a fruitcake. He is rich given that he's a pleasant manipulator, and is aware of the best way to play upon the fears of the vulnerable. If they're examples of the sorts of humans the gods want, I'll hold onto my apostasy. BTW: "Tax and spend" is not a best technique to govern, however "Don't tax and spend besides" is hardly ever greater. And whilst Clinton lied to us, three,000 humans did not die. And finally: During the Clinton years, tax sales went up, spending truthfully dropped, and we had a $three TRILLION SURPLUS. Not unhealthy for a "tax and spend scheme."
2016-09-05 13:26:02
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I am Christian, I've never listened to or followed Pat Robertson in anything. My belief is that he once possessed the good morals of a faithful Christian. But his old age has made him a bit senile / loopy. I don't think he's able to decipher godliness from ungodliness with any firm degree.
2007-11-24 13:26:40
·
answer #3
·
answered by drivn2excelchery 4
·
3⤊
0⤋
Does Pat Robertson have an actual religious sect and congregation that follows him?
He doesnt speak for every christian you know.
I dont know what christians he actually speaks for.
I dont combine religion and politics. I dont think Bush really does that much either, except when it comes to campaigning and propoganda, but ALL politicians do that. (I do actually still support some of Bush's policies, though, I just dont think religion is really that big of an influence in his political decisions)
You have to take politics for what it is. Both sides are way overexaggerating the other sides.
2007-11-24 13:28:19
·
answer #4
·
answered by cadisneygirl 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
Pat Robertson is a nut job.
2007-11-24 13:28:10
·
answer #5
·
answered by Sister blue eyes 6
·
5⤊
0⤋
Looked like the were worshiping Bush to me.
2007-11-24 13:24:58
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Its the other way around - according to George.
2007-11-24 13:27:02
·
answer #7
·
answered by I have a bear spot 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
If an asteroid is ever going to crash into the earth, Pat Robertson can leg press it away.
2007-11-24 13:24:57
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
Pat Robertson is always saying something stupid.
2007-11-24 14:22:37
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Bush and the Salvation Army are working to legalize discrimination.
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=ArV2loWUhuQOA5IMgyC9GwXsy6IX;_ylv=3?qid=20071124164621AABsNpg
2007-11-24 13:24:50
·
answer #10
·
answered by Yahoo Sucks 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
it is basically the right wing evangelicals who give all christians a bad name - when i make fun of christians I'm really referring to this group - not all christians
2007-11-24 13:25:21
·
answer #11
·
answered by PD 6
·
2⤊
0⤋