This is my cut and paste answer. The reason for that is because a tech info is a tech info, you can't beat it (sources below).
PS3 will win the console war, no doubt. Xbox 360 and Wii are so weak from technological point of view, that in couple of years they won't be capable of dealing with serious graphics. GTA IV, for instance, isn't even announced for Wii - this toy won't be able to cope with the game's requirements. Xbox 360 is getting GTA IV, however, the game is going to be released on several DVDs - Xbox 360 owners will have to interrupt gaming process and switch discs (Rockstar complained about this issue). Only PS3 will have it on single BD-DVD.
Let's compare PS3 and XBOX 360:
A third of XBOX 360 (33%) are malfunctioning right from the start. PS3 return rate is only around 0.2%. Despite some people say, that new 360 has no breakdown issues - just visit Xbox section of Yahoo answers and see for yourself an amount of complaints.
PS3 has 8 (7+1) kernels in Cell processor, Xbox 360 -only 3.
PS3 uses advanced tech called Blu-Ray, one disc can store up to 54 gb (in the future - up to 200 gb), Xbox 360 - regular dual layer DVD-9 (8.5GB). It's possible to get HD-DVD (max. - 30GB) for 360, but it'll cost you around 180$, in this case Xbox is going to be MUCH more expensive, than PS3.
Calculations per sec - PS3 - 51-billion-dot-product-operati... per second
Xbox 360 - 33.6-billion-dot-product-opera... per second
PS3 has full media support - USBs, built-in 4 slots card reader (except 20GB and 40GB versions), ability to use printer and so on.
Xbox 360 has USBs and only 2 memory slots.
PS3 supports up to 7 Bluetooth Controllers
Xbox 360 - up to 4 Controllers
PS3 - wi-fi included (except 20 gb version)
Xbox 360 - wi-fi will cost you around 100 $
Graphics are stronger in PS3, due to RSX chip, that was developed by Nvidia exclusively for PS3. RSX runs on 550 Mhz. It's difficult to compare their graphics chips, because 360 has a video chip with totally different structure and operating memory is divided differently in both consoles. However, PS3 exclusives look better than 360's exclusives.
PS3 uses technology from AGEIA company. It does to physics of the game same thing GPU (videocard processor) does to graphics. This thing is on sale for PC(special card). The price is around 350$. There is no such thing in 360.
Xbox 360 is widely known for so-called "red ring of death" problem - it gets overheated easily. My PS3 was running for more than 15 hours non-stop with no problems. Sometimes Xbox 360 becomes so overheated, that thermopaste on CPU melts, drips on motherboard and successfully shortcircuits it. That's why in some countries people call Xbox 360 "Coffin 360".
Besides all of this, I've seen disassembled Xbox 360 - regular PC architecture - Billy Gates is an uninventive nerd (as usual).
When I saw disassembled PS3 - it was a surprise - smart architecture, good cooling (don't buy external PS3 coolers - they make everything worse - original system is good), etc.
In 2008 PS3 will get more than 300 games, including Metal Gear Solid 4, The Agent and other great exclusives. Here is the good link to the future PS3 releases. http://ps3.ign.com/index/release.html......
PS3 online is free, Xbox 360 - you have to pay.
There were reports, that 360 scratches discs. No reports on that in PS3.
The funniest thing, that right now there are no games for PS3, that show full potential of the console. Biggest games weigh only 25 GB (Xbox 360 will need more than 3 discs even for those).
On PS3 you can install other OS, such as Linux Yellow Dog, Ubuntu and others. Sony officially lets you do it. There is no such thing in 360.
PS3 HDD can be replaced easily with any 2.5" SATA 5400 RPM HDD (used in laptops). 250 GB will cost you around 170$. In 360 you have to buy exclusive HDD, where 20GB will cost you 100$.
Sony expects PS3 to stay on the market for, at least, 7-10 years. Also Sony reduces price now. There is a cheaper 40GB version of PS3.
Sony constantly upgrades PS3 software (free updates for OS) - you get new functions and improvements.
PS3 controller (sixaxis) has a motion control - you move controller - game responds. Wii has it, Xbox 360 - doesn't. PS3 is getting rumble controller (Dualshock 3) in 1st quarter 2008, Japan already has it. On www.ebay.com I saw those controllers on sale 50$ and up (unofficial import)
On PS3 you can help sick people by running Folding Home project. Wii and Xbox 360 didn't even think about it.
New 40GB is 399$ or 399 euro (depends on the region) - it has no backwards compatibility with PS2 games, has 2 USBs instead of 4, no built-in card reader, but it's the same PS3, strong, reliable, less noisy, different cooling system. The price is friendly.
I didn't mention Wii, because it's so weak, no point to talk about it. Leave it for kindergarten and casual games.
www.teamxbox.com
www.kotaku.com
www.qj.net
www.ign.com
www.wikipedia.org
www.newegg.com
www.ps3fanboy.com
http://search.ebay.com/dualshock-3_W0QQ_...
and many other sources.
2007-11-24 12:10:02
·
answer #1
·
answered by Bull Goose Loony 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
PS3
2007-11-24 11:50:48
·
answer #2
·
answered by D.R.E. 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
It is all just opinion. 360's are genereally focused more towards jsut the hardcore gamer with titles like gears of war. It does not put much of an emphasis on multimedia. The ps3, while not the most popular in terms of games is capable of somethings that the 360 is not for instance the blu ray player. It all comes down to what you will be using it for.
2016-03-14 23:29:27
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I've very rarely heard of the PS3 having major problems. The 360 has had many many problems in the past. If you're looking at ONLY the problems the consoles have had, the PS3 is better.
2007-11-24 11:11:51
·
answer #4
·
answered by mirage749 3
·
5⤊
0⤋
ps3 is better in the long run,sure the 360 has good games but when they make the new xbox ,the 360 they wont make any more games.ps3 has better graphics it has internet, blue ray and the internet is like the psp and in the next year ther will be alot more games so thats why psp is better.
2007-11-27 07:53:38
·
answer #5
·
answered by drewsta 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
xbox 360
2007-11-24 11:25:19
·
answer #6
·
answered by .(o_0) 4
·
0⤊
4⤋
The PS3 does not have a lot of problems or errors. If you want to talk about errors, then talk about the Xbox 360 Red Ring of Death and a 30% hardware failure rate for most of the Xbox 360's. The PS3's hardware failure rate is less than 1% and does not have hardware issues and other overheating problems that the Xbox 360 has.
There were some minor freezing issues with the 2.00 firmware update because of a new feature called the Information Board. I turned the Information Board off of my PS3 so my PS3 never froze, but the people that used the Information Board with their PS3 has some freezing issues because of it, but Sony just came out with a new update version 2.01 just this week that fixed all of the problems with the Information Board and freezing issues.
Also, various PS3's has more built in features such as: WiFi(40GB, 60GB, and 80GB PS3's), Bluetooth, Bluray, a Web browser, free online play, compatible with both PS1 and PS2 games (20GB, 60GB, and 80GB PS3's) and digital camera flash card slots (60GB and 80GB PS3's).
What features does the Xbox 360 have built in? Lets see... compatible with some regular Xbox games, Xbox Live (you have to pay to play games online),DVD, and that's it.
The PS3 has more features, it has more advanced technology, it has good games out now and has even better exclusives coming out than the Xbox 360, so the answer is simple: Get the PS3 and "Play Beyond".
2007-11-24 11:12:57
·
answer #7
·
answered by AdrianClay 7
·
5⤊
0⤋
someone told you the ps3 has problems and errors, while the 360 is reliable. who told you that... Bill Gates. look it up, the 360 is plagued with problems
2007-11-24 11:04:39
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
1⤋
it really depends on what type of games you enjoy
if you like shooters sports games and western made games go for the 360.....
if you like action adventure and japanese made games get a ps3...
performance wise.... i had to send my 360 back 3 times for different sets of problems.... not saying its deffective just saying i might have really bad luck...
my ps3 had no problems whatsoever..... works perfectly up to now....
the truth is there is no better system..... i have all 3.... trust me they all are good or bad in some ways... the satisfaction you get from whichever system you get really depends on what type of games you like.... nuf said....
hope this helped you out!:D
2007-11-24 12:14:21
·
answer #9
·
answered by lalala 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Even though the 360 has its glitches, it is hands down the better system. Graphics will only take you so far. Sure the PS3 may have better graphics, but the quality of gameplay can't touch the 360. The 360's online service may cost you money to play, but with that comes reliability, constant improvement and just more media in general. PS3's online service is more than lacking. That's not the only thing lacking about it though, try it's game line up on for size. Not much there. All and all the XBOX 360 is the better system with a better price, better online, and better game lineup. Plus the PS3's controller could be more ergonomically designed for long gameplay. At least I know I cramp up holding that controller.
2007-11-24 11:14:37
·
answer #10
·
answered by DEATHSTORM1982 2
·
0⤊
7⤋
The internet gaming is free for the PS3 and Xbox Live is £40 per year in UK/ $50 per year in America, so over 5 years that's £200/$250 saved compared to Xbox live. If you like online play there's Resistance, Motorstorm and Warhawk. And Unreal Tournament 3 and Metal Gear Online are coming out. Also the Playstation Network has Little Big Planet and Home coming to it.
Blu-ray discs mean that more can be stored on PS3 games allowing them to be bigger. An Xbox DVD holds about 8GB but a single layer Blu-ray disc holds 25GB and a dual layer holds 50GB yet a 360 game costs the same as a PS3 game. Grand Theft Auto 4 may have to be put on multiple discs for the 360 because they're smaller and you might not like having to get up to change the disc. One level on Killzone 2 takes up 2GB which shows the scale of PS3 games. The PS3 is a very cheap Blu-ray player while you have to buy a £120/$200 add-on to play HD-DVD movies.
The PS3 has been out a year less than the 360 and it's graphics are already equalling or bettering those on the 360. As the developers become better at developing games for the PS3 the gap will only widen. As far as games go most of the better games for the Xbox are either multi-platform or going to come out for the PC at some point like Gears of War and Halo 1 & 2 already have.
The 360 is backwards compatible with about 300 Xbox games but if you get a backwards compatible PS3 then there are thousands of PS1 and PS2 games you can play.
Here's a list of what I think are or will be the best games for the PS3:
Well right now there's Resistance, Ninja Gaiden Sigma, Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion, Ratchet and Clank, Virtua Fighter 5, Resistance Fall of Man, Heavenly Sword, Stranglehold, Assassin's Creed, Virtua Tennis 3, Folklore, Ghost Recon Advanced Warfighter 2, Guitar Hero 3, Singstar and Call of Duty 4.
Uncharted, Killzone 2, Haze, MGS4, Final Fantasy XIII, Gran Turismo 5, Afrika, Little Big Planet, Tekken 6 and God of War 3 will be coming out as PS3 exclusives. Also the maker of Ico and Shadow of the Colossus is making his next game exclusively on PS3. The makers of Fahrenheit are also making their next game a PS3 exclusive.
As well as this there are ones that are multi-platform like Devil May Cry 4, Kane and Lynch: Dead Men, Lost Planet, Resident Evil 5, The Orange Box, Soul Calibur 4 and Rock Band. Also a new Jak and Daxter and Bioshock are rumoured to be coming out on the PS3. So in my opinion the PS3 has a much stronger lineup then the 360.
The Xbox is cheaper (but I don't think it is in the long run) and Xbox live is probably better (but you have to pay). The original Xbox only had a lifespan of 4 years and with the 360's problems it may only last another 2-3. The PS2 had a lifespan of 6 years and the PS3 is planned to last 7-10 years. All PS3 controllers are rechargeable, you just connect them to the USB port to charge, but you have to buy a rechargeable battery pack if you don't want to use AA batteries for the 360 pad. The PS3 has much better hardware than the Xbox which has massive 30% failure rate. The PS3's failure rate is 0.2%. 360's are known to scratch discs if they're moved while on, this would be practically impossible to happen on the PS3 anyway because blu-ray discs are hard-coated.
The PS3 is the most value for money as all models have a hard drive and Wi-fi built in but for the 360 you have to pay more in some way or another for these features. Also to play DVDs you have to buy a DVD remote for the 360 but you can just use the sixaxis if you want to play DVDs on the PS3. Only the PS3's games are all region free so you can import games from other countries before they come out or get an obscure Japanese game if you want. Also the PS3 plays full 1080p hi-definition wheras the Xbox just upscales the image.
You should get the console that has the games that you want but I'd get the PS3 because of it's games, features and reliability.The PS3 is definitely not a paper weight.
2007-11-24 11:13:32
·
answer #11
·
answered by Neil G 5
·
5⤊
0⤋