English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-11-24 10:14:10 · 9 answers · asked by caldeira32 1 in Science & Mathematics Medicine

I'm looking for a specific, actual term.

2007-11-24 10:49:44 · update #1

9 answers

There is no one word for this in medicine - but in military history terms, such a cure would be a "Pyrrhic Victory" - a victory with devastating cost to the victor.

"iatrogenic" means caused by the medical care but does not necessarily imply that the iatrogenic problem created is worse than the disease.

For instance, hair loss from chemotherapy for acute leukemia is an iatrogenic problem. The hair loss is caused by the doctor's treatment. The result of not treating acute leukemia with chemotherapy is always death. Patients with acute leukemia have to decide which is worse - temporary hair loss or death within a few weeks with no treatment.

On the other hand, chemotherapy for advanced pancreatic cancer may do more harm than good. Chemotherapy does not offer a real chance of cure for extensive, unresectable pancreas cancer. It might be wise to chose no chemotherapy treatment in that situation - though many patients want to try 'something'.
I spent a lot of time trying to talk people out of taking chemotherapy for some types of cancer.

People should understand that there are hundreds of different cancers and hundreds of chemotherapy drug combinations using more than fifty drugs. Cancer is not one thing. Chemotherapy is not one thing.

Oh, back to your question - here's the breakdown of the word "iatrogenic." It comes from the Greek roots "iatros" meaning "the healer or physician" + "gennan" meaning "as a product of" = due to the doctor.

2007-11-24 17:38:34 · answer #1 · answered by Spreedog 7 · 0 2

Malpractice?
Actually all treatments have a risk versus benefit analysis associated with them. If the treatment is worse than the disease, why do it? Even chemotherapy has the benefit of potentially extending life versus the risk of feeling very sick as side effect. In medicine there is sometimes a tendency to view success in how long the patient lives, but by sacrificing quality of life.

2007-11-24 10:24:17 · answer #2 · answered by pschroeter 5 · 0 1

Best Answer:
n. remepeiormobus - pronounced rem-pay-or-mor-bus
From Latin roots for "cure" "worsens" and "disease"

P.S. Yep, I made that up - but it's also right. Look it up on Google translate as "reme-peior-morbus"

2014-06-02 06:20:23 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

its called iatrogenic disease: a disease caused by giving or doing a wrong procedure to the patient which results in a condition worse that the disease itself or the development of another disease/condition as a result of a treatment given by a medical practitioner to a patient.

2007-11-24 12:16:45 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Yes. Chemotherapy.

2007-11-24 11:02:38 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Yes! A Doctor's mistake, again

2007-11-24 10:17:43 · answer #6 · answered by EnglishDenis 3 · 0 1

Have to agree with the answer, CHEMOTHERAPY. My friend has bilateral breast CA. Says she is sick for 3 days after Chemo. WITHOUT it she feels fine.....

2007-11-24 16:06:39 · answer #7 · answered by MBlessed (SOC) 5 · 1 1

sorry....i have to say 3rd's to the chemotherapy....i just said no to it this past year and have no regrets (it was either that or no fingernails :-( )
but i'm glad someone had the actual word for it :-)

2007-11-24 13:40:40 · answer #8 · answered by bella36 5 · 0 1

chemo thearepy

2007-11-24 10:17:26 · answer #9 · answered by malika s 2 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers