and there complety differant you can't believe in both! you might say you believe in both but what do you really believe in?
2007-11-24 09:08:36 · 27 answers · asked by Faith 2 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
The only big bang was when God created the earth. If things could be created on there own then why aren’t there more earths with living people out their?
2007-11-24 09:24:12 · answer #1 · answered by REV TEXAS 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Big Bang may only be an answer to how and not why.
Perhaps the Big Bang IS the Genesis. Just a thought.
Like how many licks it takes to get to the Tootsie Roll center of a Tootsie Pop, The world may never know... Until the clouds part and the Rapture begins...
Besides, was it always that everything was smaller than an atom (very compressed). What came before that? What caused it to go from a soup of matter to a giant explosion?
2007-11-24 17:18:09 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Err, the Big Bang and the Bible are completely compatible. Big Bang theory says nothing about what caused it, or even what happened at that exact moment, so you could easily put a creator there if you wanted to. Now, that doesn't mean that that position is correct, but there's nothing about the theory itself that rules out the possibility of a creator existing at the start.
Actually, out of all the beginning-of-the-universe ideas that people have proposed throughout history, the Big Bang is the MOST compatible with religion, in my opinion.
2007-11-24 17:14:29 · answer #3 · answered by . 7 · 7⤊ 1⤋
You cannot get Order out of Chaos. The Idea that there was a Big Bang and suddenly you have The Sun at the Right distance from Earth, our Planet tilted at just the right Angle, just the Right amount of Chemiclas to sustain life on this Planet, The right Foods?...... I think NOT.
2007-11-24 17:25:49 · answer #4 · answered by conundrum 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bible
2007-11-24 17:28:43 · answer #5 · answered by Kag 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I believe that God created the heavens and the earth.
Did he do it with a big bang? Maybe.
It's still a theory and an ever changing one, so don't lay too much money on it having happened as anyone says it did.
2007-11-24 17:22:12 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why can't I believe in both ?
Bible says that which is seen (matter) was created from that which is not seen (energy) -- the Big Bang theory says the same, that which we see was created from something we don't know yet (cant see ?) According to physics, matter and energy are interchangeable.
2007-11-24 17:17:47 · answer #7 · answered by I have a bear spot 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
yes they are completely different. they arent even part of the same subject. big bang theory is science. the bible is religion(faith). big bang theory states what happened and what is happening. religion tries to find reason behind it all. therefor it is possible to believe in the bible and accept the big bang theory because they have two separate domains.
2007-11-24 17:18:23 · answer #8 · answered by god_of_the_accursed 6 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Apparently the Bible can't teach people how to spell.
The big bang theory and the creation account of the Bible are not mutually exclusive.
2007-11-24 17:13:40 · answer #9 · answered by 雅威的烤面包机 6 · 6⤊ 0⤋
The Vatican Observatory and the Vatican are not threatened by science but embraces it. If the big bang did happen and brought about the universe it is because it is God's work and nothing more than that.
The prime mover behind the universe might be the 'Big Bang' but God is certainly the prime mover behind the 'Big Bang'.
2007-11-24 17:15:52 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋