Any "we can agree to disagree" statements will just get a thumbs down. I really want to know if any hardcore atheists and hardcore Christians actually agree on some fundamental matters.
2007-11-24
01:50:14
·
7 answers
·
asked by
fierce beard
5
in
Society & Culture
➔ Religion & Spirituality
Faye and morris, so far so good. This is what I am looking for.
2007-11-24
02:55:06 ·
update #1
Heretic Savant, I like your finish.
2007-11-24
02:55:47 ·
update #2
I would think we all agree on the importance of love.
2007-11-24 01:56:10
·
answer #1
·
answered by Faye 4
·
4⤊
0⤋
I don't want to convince anyone against their will. I also do not want to go to Atheist site to convert those who are so set. I am interested in making my plea to those who are honestly seeking God.
What are the fundamental matters? To live as well as possible?
To an Atheist, that would mean denying what I would call the truth. That to me is fundamentally wrong, but I will allow them their personal conviction. What is it to me? I know also that God does not want everyone, but only a remnant of people from this Earth.
So in order to get agreement on fundamental things, it would have to change, and I won't!
Is there anything that we can agree on? Why? Why would I care? Because I can tell you, I don't care. Anyone can have any belief, even those with no belief. It's not something that I am aiming for - to get along. Why does everyone have to get along? Especially when most people don't know the truth about God!
So call me a hardcore Christian. That's okay, it feels fine on me. I won't dispute it, though an Atheist would think I am delusional and crazy, and that's just fine with me! I have picked a side to be on, and it happens to figure into eternity.
Where does an Atheist figure on spending eternity? If all the knowledge of Evolution was brought before them, and the scientists have figured out everything about space travel, and if all knowledge on cancer was brought to light and as curable as a cut on the finger, where does the Atheist figure on spending eternity?
2007-11-24 02:12:20
·
answer #2
·
answered by Christian Sinner 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
interior the Webster dictionary, technology potential 'a community of understanding this is an merchandise of learn, esp. organic technology; understanding protecting regularly occurring truths or the operation of regularly occurring rules esp. as gained and examined via the scientific approach. via this definition, i think of all of us can agree that technology is using intelligence to income an merchandise. and via those study, we can discover regularly occurring truths. faith isn't a technology. that's a prepare of difficulty-loose ideals interior of a community. The truths of religion come from the final public of the theologists and pupils interior of that faith. while there are disagreements, a smash can happen and a sparkling faith could be formed. interior of technology, if there's a conflict of words, there could be a smash yet a sparkling technology will no longer be able to be formed. God or religious human beings can clarify technology yet technology will no longer be able to describe God or religious human beings. that is why there are a number of arguments between us.
2016-10-17 23:19:53
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
We can agree on a few things.
1. We are alive
2. We are all human beings.
3. We disagree on pretty much everything else.
You see. There we go.
2007-11-24 02:08:05
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
My concerns are not of this world.
I may be here another 15 to 20 years and my life is over.
Then I face eternity. Therefore my eternity is of greater importance to me.
That's not to say I'm not concerned about the state of affairs in this world I'm just old enough to realize that there is nothing I can do but attempt to control things in my little part of it.
2007-11-24 02:04:02
·
answer #5
·
answered by drg5609 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
I don't see how anyone would disagree with helping the poor and hungry people of this world.
2007-11-24 01:56:44
·
answer #6
·
answered by morris 5
·
4⤊
0⤋
ignorance is bliss
2007-11-24 01:54:19
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋