2007-11-23 13:07:33 · 7 answers · asked by TBEAR 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
there have been examples of them prorating the bonus and taking back a certain amount as they get out, they also do that and stuff like not counting days in basic training and ait as going towards severance packages
2007-11-23 13:16:21 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you leave the military early for reasons other than a service connected disability they prorate your enlistment bonus. Due to a clerical error some soldiers who left due to a service connected disability were put on the prorate list. The Army is NOT asking for the return of bonuses of those with service connected disabilities.
2007-11-23 13:51:17 · answer #2 · answered by Gray Wanderer 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Injured troops to keep their bonuses
Posted November 21st, 2007 at 1:30 pm
Share This | Spotlight | Permalink
Following up on an item from yesterday, news that injured U.S. troops were being asked to return bonus money from the military spread very quickly, putting the Pentagon in a very awkward position. The good news, the practice apparently won’t happen any more.
To briefly recap for those just joining us, a CBS affiliate in Pittsburgh reported this week that the Pentagon is “demanding that thousands of wounded service personnel give back signing bonuses because they are unable to serve out their commitments.” Troops get up to $30,000 enlistment bonuses, but in thousands of cases, soldiers seriously wounded during their deployments have been ordered to pay back some of the money.
In particular, the report focused on Iraq war veteran Jordan Fox, who was seriously injured when a roadside bomb blew up his vehicle, causing back injuries and blindness in his right eye. He was sent home, unable to complete the final three months of his military commitment. Last week, the Pentagon sent him a bill: Fox owed the government nearly $3,000 of his signing bonus.
This morning, Brigadier General Michael Tucker, deputy commanding general of Walter Reed, appeared on Fox News to discuss the controversy. He acknowledged that this has happened, but assured the audience that it was a mistake that wouldn’t happen again.
This is, to be sure, encouraging. For those who can’t watch clips online, Gen. Tucker said, “We’re not sure what happened, but we’re gonna fix it.” Troops will not be asked for a refund, and those who’ve already given bonus money back will be reimbursed.
But there are a few lingering questions.
Paul Kiel explains that troops will now be able to keep the money they’ve already received, but what about the rest of the money they’re owed?
Tucker said that army policy “is that soldiers who are wounded in combat or have line of duty investigation injuries… we will not go after a recoupment of any bonuses they receive.” Recouping bonuses, he said, “doesn’t pass the common sense test.”
But notice that phrasing. While that policy, if implemented, would prevent injured soldiers from having to pay back bonuses they’d already received, they might still not receive their full enlistment bonus. That’s because the Army could still withhold parts of the bonus on the basis that the soldiers didn’t complete their full tour due to the injury.
Indeed, Rep. Jason Altmire (D-Penn.), who’s taken the lead on protecting the troops’ bonuses added, “…I am disappointed that the policy does not go further by stating that wounded soldiers will also receive the remaining balance of future bonus payments. It is preposterous for our government to have a policy that says that a soldier who has sustained serious injuries in the field of battle has not fulfilled his or her service obligation.”
Troops get their full enlistment bonus after they fulfill their contract. Injured troops who can’t serve obviously can’t finish their obligation. Altmire wants to change that, and while I know Republican lawmakers tend to reflexively object to any Democratic legislation regarding the troops, I’d like to think Altmire’s proposals to fix the system would pass Congress unanimously.
2007-11-25 02:42:10 · answer #3 · answered by Viper A 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It depends on the reason they are discharged. The classification given by the personnel office determines the amount, if any, required to be refunded.
2007-11-24 13:11:03 · answer #4 · answered by isix 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. you have to realize there are 3 ways of doing things, the right way, the wrong way, and the Army way. You'll never fully understand this unless you are in.
2007-11-23 13:21:55 · answer #5 · answered by Barry auh2o 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Another Urban Legend that has been Debunked.
2007-11-23 13:43:32 · answer #6 · answered by ? 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No they are not. Please see the following article...
http://www.army.mil/-news/2007/11/21/6245-wounded-warriors-entitled-to-keep-bonus-payments/
2007-11-23 13:16:33 · answer #7 · answered by drgnrdr451 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋