if you say Sumaria, you are wrong.
look at the galaxy, we, humans, exist on the outer rim of the circle. life began in the center of the galaxy, that is saying our human existence began there.
acccording to the bible life began with adam and Eve and it is possible that the garden of eden was never on this planet. if it was it existed by the tigris and euphrates river.
according to the book of urantia adam and eve came to this planet as ambassadors. There were already 4 races on this planet when they came.
according to some this was a prison planet
where criminals were sent. oh, that sounds nice.
There is a God! and there is a creator and a messiah. because of what is universal you cannot define origins of life by science and athiests who control the theories of science.
2007-11-23 11:15:49 · 22 answers · asked by Priestcalling 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
when i wrote this quesiton i thought i was being smart.
2007-11-24 16:07:04 · update #1
http://www.mormon.org/mormonorg/eng/exhibit#Isaiah_life_before_earth
2007-11-23 11:18:53 · answer #1 · answered by Fabio 1 · 0⤊ 2⤋
We don't know.
We're pretty that life began somewhere on Earth although some people have suggested that it may have started on Mars and been bought to earth by meteorites that originated on Mars and some have even suggested that life may have come from outside the solar system.
Without any evidence of panspermia though the theory that life started on Earth seems most likely (besides, life seems to be pretty easy to get started anyway).
"look at the galaxy, we, humans, exist on the outer rim of the circle. life began in the center of the galaxy, that is saying our human existence began there."
The centre of the galaxy is a pretty hostile place, there's a black hole right in the centre and then it is surrounded by old stars, some of which blow up (and back billions of years ago there were a lot more stars blowing up there) which would end up causing mass extinctions on nearby planets.
"acccording to the bible"
The bible is known to be an inaccurate book, nothing written in it should be taken seriously unless an earlier non-religious source confirms it.
"according to the book of urantia"
Also a known inaccurate book that should not be taken seriously.
"There were already 4 races on this planet when they came."
There is no evidence of another four races on Earth at any time during our prehistory.
"There is a God!"
There is no proof of that statement and good reasons to suspect it is wrong.
"and there is a creator and a messiah."
There is no good evidence of a creator or a messiah anywhere.
"because of what is universal you cannot define origins of life by science"
The origins of life is properly the domain of science and should be studied by science.
Religion has nothing worthwhile to contribute to our description of how the universe works.
"athiests who control the theories of science."
About time you got some semblance of accuracy.
2007-11-23 19:31:23 · answer #2 · answered by bestonnet_00 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
This is wrong on so many levels it's hard to know where to begin. No, life didn't begin at the center of the galaxy, because it's not even possible for life to exist there. No, the Bible does not say life began with Adam and Eve. The Bible says that Adam and Eve were the LAST of the living creatures God created. Yes, it is possible by the use of science to discover where life began, EVEN IF there is a God. And no, atheists do not control the theories of science.
2007-11-23 19:21:46 · answer #3 · answered by Jonathan 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
My thoughts were much like yours and I often wondered why and how things began. It is possible that there is no beginning of anything. That we evolved into what we are from what we were makes sense if you leave out time.
We always think that everything has a beginning and an end. This is because the Bible says this at the very first. "In the beginning God". This train of thought has been our only concept of creation that begins and ends.
Well as you probably know most of what is in the bible is simply not true. It is a book assembled back in 320CE and then it had some holding power but today it doesn't except for some here and there that still adhere to its ancient doctrines.
2007-11-23 19:31:04 · answer #4 · answered by wayne s 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Point number one: ATHEISTS DO NOT CONTROL SCIENCE. You have been misled somewhere along the line.
However, if you are going to ONLY look at the bible for advice on science, you're closing a lot of doors for yourself. I'm not saying abandon your beliefs, and I'm not trying to change them either, I'm just saying a lot of science is really fascinating!
And sometimes, science is used to strengthen one's faith. My mother is a nurse, and she told me that the more she learns about the human body, the more she believes it could not be an evolutionary thing. While I don't agree with her, that's her stand.
All I'm saying is don't reject it all. Science is the reason we have life-saving medicines, means of communication across the world, and other great things.
2007-11-23 19:23:35 · answer #5 · answered by Euphonie 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Go look up Galactic Habitable Zone. NOTHING can live anywhere near the centre of a galaxy - it's a furnace of radiation, and would tear any life to pieces in seconds.
You'd be safer in a nuclear reactor.
CD
2007-11-23 19:28:07 · answer #6 · answered by Super Atheist 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Gen:1
2007-11-23 19:20:27 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Sylva, North Carolina
2007-11-23 19:24:36 · answer #8 · answered by What? Me Worry? 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Nah, life began way before Adam and Eve. Not all Christians believe that.
2007-11-23 19:20:57 · answer #9 · answered by Nels 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Genisis Chpt. 1
2007-11-23 19:22:54 · answer #10 · answered by 2telldatruth 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Some fruitcake writes a book outlining his demented fantasies and someone even nuttier believes it
2007-11-23 19:25:53 · answer #11 · answered by Nemesis 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋