It will only be a nuclear war if we allow Iran to go nuclear, and if we dont intervene SOON and stop them, we are utterly MAD!
The Iranian regime is one of religious extremism, the idea of death, mass destruction and armageddon does not worry them, after all theyre going straight to paradise with all those virgin little boys awaiting them arent they!
Also, Iran is a Shia muslim country, if we allow them to go nuclear, many Sunni countries will feel threatened, and go nuclear themselves, Saudi, Egypt, Syria and Algeria have already stated they may.....we do not need a nuclear arms race in the most volatile region in the world. Thats ANOTHER reason to stop Iran!
Iran is run by an evil regime that actively supports terrorism in Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Israel and Afghanistan. It persecutes women, represses freedom of speech and democracy, persecutes ethnic and religious minorities and is anti Semitic. It Hates the West, Israel,Christians and Sunni Muslims......Would you trust a nuclear Iran? Didnt think so!
Also, we would probably not need to actually invade Iran, rather just knock out its facilities with air and missile strikes, in the way Israel did to Iraqs nuclear programme in 1980.
Theres no way the West would want to actually conquer and occupy the country, and i have no doubt they wont try to do this....but Iran must be stopped, better now than trying it once theyve gone nuclear!
Hope all this helps
2007-11-24 00:51:51
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I doubt war is soon.
Why? Because Russia has promised to back Iran, and the UN has thoroughly investigated Iran's peaceful nuclear program
I do think Iran is an oppressed country, but there is no way Bush will be able to rally the American people towards supporting an invasion, much less carrying out an invasion of yet another quagmire-ready country
Iran also has been sanctions-free for years, so they have a much stronger economy and modernized military with peaceful trade ties to many US allies
Before the Iraq war, we had a great deal of warning that it was coming. Not just warnings, but outright around-the-clock preparations. There isn't enough time for Bush to get that underway, even if he was going to.
2007-11-23 09:36:08
·
answer #2
·
answered by MrPotatoHead 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
Iran has a serious flaw. The government is not well liked. When Iraq and Afganistan stabalize, people will just flee more (there are alreay Iranian refugees in Iraq and Iran suffers from low birth rate and negative migration which are both signs of unhappyness) than they are. Iraq and Afganistan could end up greatly increasing their population in a short period of time. What would be left would be a shell of a bunch of religious people that have no ability to run a modern country.
2007-11-23 10:42:56
·
answer #3
·
answered by gregory_dittman 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
I think war is imminent, and not for any of that crap you hear about on the news. Iran may be "backed" by Russia,but that means little when US and Russia are allies! On top of that, Iran's central bank isn't owned & controlled by a Rothschild affiliate(World Bank,IMF,Federal Reserve). Before the current war, Iraq didnt have one either! There are only 5 nations left who dont have Rothschild controlled central banks! Sudan,North Korea,Cuba,Iran,and....cant remember the other one right now!! The Rothschilds run the US through the Federal Reserve,and if you notice,US is at odds one way or another with ALL of these countries! They'll destroy Iran's infrastructure,kill thousands of their people,then the US taxpayers will foot the bill for rebuilding while they steal all of Iran's natural resources!!!
2007-11-23 10:10:00
·
answer #4
·
answered by frankybars 1
·
2⤊
2⤋
They would never use Nuclear weapons on Iran in a million years.
As for War i for one wouldn't be happy it has nothing to do with the UK.
The UN should be monitoring Irans activity they are the so called holders of international law. If they feel military action is neccasary it should be sanctioned through the UN.
Have we not learned anything from Iraq !!
2007-11-23 09:37:57
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 7
·
2⤊
2⤋
Official US military info from last week, 60% of foreign terrorists in Iraq are Saudis, 30 Syrians and only 1% Iraniens. so much for the bad, bad Iran. Accidentially, it is estimated, that 80% of terror money comes from the Saudis, which is nothing new.
2007-11-23 09:43:20
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
2⤋
have you ever any theory what your speaking approximately .. have you ever seen the dimensions of Iran, its the dimensions of the completed of Europe and two times the dimensions of texas, the place precisely might you invade?? . you have too lots Jewsih propoganda being fed on your concepts and ur soaking all of it up... the american human beings dont have to any extent further abdomen for yet another lifeless end conflict killing 5000 plus. of our preferable boys....
2016-10-17 22:20:06
·
answer #7
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Sinking Dollar is trouble for USA.
USA needs to stop Iran as Iran is selling oil with Euro.
It is life and death for USA.
2007-11-23 09:38:02
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
3⤋
and should they do so they will probably enlist the Iraqis, paying them $ and thus sorting out the internal problems there.
2007-11-23 09:46:04
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋