We have 8-9 million people come here on visas every year. According t Dick morris' book, Outrage, over 3 million of those did not leave when theri visas expired and just hid out in the country, that was just in 2005. So they flew in for the most part I guess, but being dropped in is a big security threat, you might contact eh Air Force and tell them because they are supose to make sure no planes form out of the country fly around. take care.
2007-11-23 07:03:48
·
answer #1
·
answered by R J 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Wow! Sure looks like a wall is needed in the sky! Aliens dropping from the sky! Now I've heard everything! What color parachutes did they use? Or did they just flap their wings? How do you know that they are Africans? Maybe they are just black Martians,did ya ever consider that? Call Fox News! They'll be right out there with a satelite truck to put it on the air LIVE! Would that make ya happy?
2007-11-23 07:09:49
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
The real answer is "no" - those public lands are closed to the public after sunset. Your best bet would be to report them to the local police or the Forest Preserve Police. They will treat them as trespassers.
In moving them, it is up to the police to determine other issues, like whether they should be in the area at all. Given than Chicago is a sanctuary city though, I wouldn't hold much hope for getting them deported if they are illegal.
You could also try calling ICE, but I bet they'd send to you back to the local police.
2007-11-23 09:50:37
·
answer #3
·
answered by DaisyCake 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
I live in the new expanded version of Chicago. (never was before). I didn't know about the air drops......have heard of the acres of pot fields though. Don't you think....if given a choice.....that there wouldn't be millions of people camping out and surviving in these areas if it was legal? They can't stay un-noticed. I wonder why they allow them, but won't allow citizens to do the same? It's not like our own citizens wouldn't prefere that vs sleeping on park benches or dark alleys.
2007-11-23 08:09:27
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
I agree, it truly isn't any longer undesirable, even if it would not flow o.k.. it truly is totally uneven. You hop from description of the wooded area to his concepts about his pal and decrease back back. like this right here: trekking up huge boulders and searching the gazebos i eventually were given lost, circling the large wooded area. truly, I wasn’t lost, i changed into basically wondered. the position could she are starting to be in twenty seconds? no longer far—I changed into hoping. The sunlight changed into blocked by the timber, making me experience purely the moderate breeze blowing by my hair. It cleared my concepts. you turn from him questioning about his pal to how the timber blocked the sunlight. you want a lead-in top there. start up a sparkling paragraph first of all, then do something like, "I shifted my concentration to the line of timber on the horizon, searching for the sunlight." keep on with the position he seems to boot. and top right here: i tried to map out the position i changed into. -- teach precisely what he's searching at. something like, "I grew to change into my gaze to the invisible path on the wooded area floor." you want extra of that type of element to save it fluent. you want to grant small motives for why he's doing element, so it would not seem so jumpy. there's a technical be conscious for this it truly is eluding me at present. I call them "tie ins". It leads from one element to a special fluently. 20 seconds is definitely too literal. changed into he gazing his watch? If no longer, use "some seconds" or perhaps count number heartbeats or breaths or something a touch extra organic. desire this facilitates.
2016-10-24 23:14:35
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋