Bush seems to be in collusion with illegal aliens...especially those from Mexico. He appears to support their invasion of America. What do you think?
Also, does it occur to anyone that Al Quaeda can slip through our borders....lol. It's an amusing notion...one suitable for a cartoon editorial depicting America with it's guns trained on Iraq, Afghanistan, and Iran and there is a cut-away view of Osama Bin Laden crawling in a tunnel toward us under the US Border fence with a nuclear bomb in tow.
2007-11-23
01:28:12
·
25 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Immigration
Since American troops are in Iraq, et al in the name of National Security, why can't some of them be assigned to border patrol for this same reason?
2007-11-23
01:43:45 ·
update #1
NAU... (Eyes open for the first time....bells ring). Now "all the dots are connected". So, I guess the next question would be, when are we going to impeach the Anti-Christ?
2007-11-23
01:56:13 ·
update #2
Why ty, ggentry! Good looking out.
2007-11-23
02:02:28 ·
update #3
Okay folks. I read what you're saying about Bush and the inevitability of the NAU... But, the last time I checked, this country was claiming to be a democracy. What has happened to us that we are making fatalistic statements about this country's destiny and our destiny? Bush stole the Presidential election through the dismissal of the votes of at least a half a million black Floridians. Bush took us to a war most of us were scratching our heads about in Iraq looking for the big bad boogey man a.k.a WOMD only to find out the fool had no exit strategy after involving us in that mess, and now, Jethro Bodine and his mob want to throw us to the wolves and literally dismantle America. And all we can say is, "Oh well...."
2007-11-23
05:34:12 ·
update #4
Apparently GW can do no wrong. All he has to do is to wrap himself in the American flag and lay waste to this country while we are rendered paralyzed, like deer in headlights, watching him destroy us. Now, that's charisma.
2007-11-23
05:38:03 ·
update #5
I am not going to choose the best answer for this question. I will let you guys decide.
2007-11-23
05:41:43 ·
update #6
This issue is my biggest complaint with Bush. If you are serious about the "War on Terror," sealing the borders is essential. The only thing I can guess is that the rumors about a coordinated movement to form an American version of the European Block are true, and that Bush (along with many others) in DC don't want to effect that.
2007-11-23 01:41:25
·
answer #1
·
answered by kathy_is_a_nurse 7
·
8⤊
2⤋
Bush is a stooge for the global elites who have been planning a one world socialist government (New World Order) for a very long time. They are now leading us into it. They are selling America right out from under us by setting the stage for a North American Union (NAU). This will be a “trilateral” merger of the U.S., Canada and Mexico into one big superstate. This is also the hidden agenda behind the Bush administration's support of open borders. Bush’s refusal to recognize America as a distinct, sovereign nation was evident when he pushed amnesty for illegals. NAU is being planned without the consent or knowledge of American citizens or Congress. President Bush has already attended several clandestine meetings behind closed doors with the Mexican President and the Canadian Prime Minister. Thankfully, these secret meetings got leaked. But the fact that we never hear much about this plot through the mainstream media goes to show you how much the media is really CONTROLLED!! Lou Dobbs is the only one I know of in the media who reports on this. It is disturbing that this is occurring right under our noses. Money from our treasury is now being spent on this effort. I mean, this is not some small change… this will be the end of America as we know it. We will have a North American currency - the Amero; we will have a NAFTA Superhighway that will stretch from Mexico to Canada; we will have a North American Constitution - modeled after the Soviet Union's Constitution. Our rights will be stripped even more than already have been. Rights will not be inalienable, but instead granted by government and can be revoked at any time at their will. It will certainly not be a government of and by the people!!
People like to dismiss this as "crazy conspiracy theory", but it's not a theory anymore! The people who are behind this really are conspirators and it is a proven fact.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-vda1KRF75M
2007-11-23 04:55:27
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
1⤋
If the American citizen living on the border would make his/her land an unwelcome, dangerous avenue for the criminals, that would help.
But, the NAU is on it's way. Sadly, our great nation will be destroyed so a few people can into the history books.
Mexico will gain while Canada and America lose! I pick on Canadians, but honestly, the country is beautiful and the people are great!
The administrations of 3 nations will destroy 2 just to make one better.
2007-11-23 04:46:59
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
1⤋
Bush is pursuing a globalist agenda to create a North American Union, which would erase our borders with both Mexico and Canada. This was the agenda behind the Bush administration's true open borders policy.
The Bush administration is pursuing a policy to expand NAFTA politically, setting the stage for a North American Union. What the Bush administration truly wants is the free, unimpeded movement of people across open borders with Mexico and Canada.
President Bush intends to abrogate U.S. sovereignty to the North American Union, a new economic and political entity which the President is quietly forming, much as the European Union has formed.
The blueprint President Bush is following was laid out in a 2005 report entitled "Building a North American Community" published by the left-of-center Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). The CFR report connects the dots between the Bush administration's actual policy on illegal immigration and the drive to create the North American Union:
At their meeting in Waco, Texas, at the end of March 2005, U.S. President George W. Bush, Mexican President Vicente Fox, and Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin committed their governments to a path of cooperation and joint action. We welcome this important development and offer this report to add urgency and specific recommendations to strengthen their efforts.
What is the plan? Simple, erase the borders. The plan is contained in a "Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America" little noticed when President Bush and President Fox created it in March 2005:
2007-11-23 03:51:25
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
1⤋
I definately think of extra must be executed on the borders yet I additionally sense that's quite confusing to divide forces, there is sufficient happening interior the middle east that retains the troops very occupied. i'm extremely uncomfortable with the countless invasions of illegals. I in basic terms would desire to believe God for His secure practices.
2016-10-17 21:34:57
·
answer #5
·
answered by launer 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Watch Glen Beck for a week and you will understand why you have a little voice inside you telling you that something is wrong with this picture.
This is the modern day slave trade market but the big companies don't want you to know that.
The big boys are making six figures while you and I are getting called racist.
They even ignore the drugs crossing the borders, as long as they get dirt cheap labor.
2007-11-23 12:13:47
·
answer #6
·
answered by 1hillbilly 2
·
3⤊
1⤋
You can't just blame GW for the past 20 years on non enforcement. In 1986 Teddy Kennedy promised the American people he would never bring another amnesty to the American people. He promised to seal the borders.
People have got to STOP blaming the Republican party for all of our immigration problems. Sure there are those that we Call RINO's but for the most part it is the Democrats that are the problem.
Two years ago the Republican controlled House passed HR 4437 which was the enforcement only bill. This is what the american people wanted.
The Democrat controlled Senate would have no part of it. They wanted to grant amnesty and promise enforcement...just like they have been doing for the past 20 years. For two years the democrats have been trying to cram amnesty down our throats. First it was wholesale amnesty, then piecemeal. The last attempt was Dick Durbin's nitemare act.
Bottom line is nothing gets done. The borders are still wide open.
Don't take my word for it. Look up the voting records of our elected representatives. I think you will find that the Demos tend to line up on the side of the open border/amnesty crowd while the Repubs tend to line up on the no amnesty/close the borders.
2007-11-23 04:21:49
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
4⤋
I am tired of people singling out one person or one party to blame for all the mess we are in and I'm tired of listening to every kook who has a "conspiracy theory".
There are two reasons we have the problems with the country that we have. They are; 1: We have people in office of importance (Republican and Democrat) who think that good politics means making it look like what everyone else is doing is worse than what you are doing. (you can only get to the top by pulling everyone else down) and 2: We the people sit on our butts and do absolutely nothing but whine and cry about how bad it is.
The bottom line here is, if you don't like what's happening, do something about it and stop whining.
To the person with the oriental mark as a name, if you are wanting to insult someone's intelligence, make sure you know how to spell first. I believe this issue here is the problem with ILLEGAL Immigrants not LEGAL Immigrants. You seem a little confused.
2007-11-23 02:16:09
·
answer #8
·
answered by theanswerman63 3
·
9⤊
3⤋
Because the crooks and liars who put him in office don't want the borders closed and the illegals deported neither does Bush..
2007-11-25 02:05:35
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
What a stupid rant! Do you realize there are 37 states that have open coastlines or borders with Canada& Mexico. How do we build a wall in the middle of the GreatLakes,or the Rio Grande? How about a wall all the way around the Gulf of Mexico and Florida?
2007-11-23 05:19:23
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
4⤋