There is so much controversy over abortion. It should be a closed argument The Supreme Court has already decided the issue in Row Verses Wade. The fundies have an age of responsibility I think it's 12 before a child is responsible for his sins. They should revise and extend the ruling on Row verses Wade to include an age limit. Parents should be able to abort their kids at least until they are old enough to do some useful work around the house. Say about the age of twelve?
2007-11-23 00:12:40 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
I'm sure a lot of people are going to get pissed off at this question, and Im sure its supposed to be a joke, but its one of the most truthful ones I've seen. People dont mind killing them when they have no voice, even though they're still alive, and still human, and still a child. Why should those same people mind killing the same kid a few years later?
2007-11-23 00:18:15 · answer #1 · answered by Dani 7 · 4⤊ 0⤋
The "age of accountability" doesn't have an actual age to it. What the fundies say has no bearing on what the Supreme Court rules on it.
Old enough to do some useful work around the house? I was 10 and doing dishes, laundry and cutting the grass. You must have had a very easy childhood. lol
2007-11-23 00:28:22 · answer #2 · answered by River 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Some states do it up to 9 months. A baby can be born at 19 weeks and still live. Its on the internet. A woman went into labor at 19 weeks and she lied and told the doctor she was 24 weeks so he would save her baby. Now she is two years old and healthy. You need to just explain to her (if its not too late) that she needs to not get rid of that baby but just at least give it up for an adoption.
2016-05-25 02:24:35 · answer #3 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ha! Ha! (more uneasy laughter) I am going to assume this is some sort of joke and hope that you do not now or in the near future have children. I'd like to point out that some parents have been exercising this lapse in judgment increasingly these days, it is called murder.
While it brings about a valid point as another poster said, I just think it's sad.
2007-11-23 00:40:26 · answer #4 · answered by Gloria H 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hold on now, wait a minute, stop and think of what you are really saying.
We need young people to at least attain the age of 18 so they can be trained to carry war weapons to go fight to protect our standard of living. We need to make sure that abortion is stopped so we can have more young people to die for our causes so we can stay back here at home and drink beer and watch TV.
2007-11-23 00:39:19 · answer #5 · answered by Richard C 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I'm going to believe that this is not a serious question. If, by some stretch it is, I really hope you have no children. Other than that, our kids can make us crazy sometimes, but they can bring great joy too. I don't know of a person alive or dead that hasn't made someone crazy at one point in their life so kids should be no exception to that.
2007-11-23 00:17:15 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
If they can scream from pain then its child abuse.. if they cannot its abortion. p.s. Roe vs Wade was based on a lie.. the gal that was pushed as 'the example' through the courts is a prolifer now.
2007-11-23 01:40:15 · answer #7 · answered by Tapestry6 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Let's just take that thought to its natural conclusion and make it so we can kill anyone for any reason. If we can draw the line at an age, let's do away with the artificial rules and just do it when we see fit.
2007-11-23 00:16:27 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Um.. Roe v. Wade wasn't initially about abortion at all.
2007-11-23 00:33:41 · answer #9 · answered by capitalctu 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ahhh, but you can't possibly want to kill something that's looked into your face and given you that toothy smile :-D Come on, you know you couldn't do it.
2007-11-23 00:21:51 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋