http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6mmskXXetcg
2007-11-23 00:05:04 · 4 answers · asked by Belzetot 5 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Enh (shrug). Nothing new there. He assumes a lot of things:
All religion is the same.
There's no way of evaluating which religions have merit and which don't.
People just blindly follow whichever religion they're brought up in, they don't decide for themselves which is best (therefore there are no converts)
My problem with Dawkins and a lot of aetheist preachers is that they don't understand what people with faith are thinking. Nevermind agree with them, the don't even know.
2007-11-23 00:16:23 · answer #1 · answered by Moara 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
When Richard Dawkins shows that he actually understands what faith is about, then it might be worth responding to him on these things. Until that day arrives, he should stick to doing what he does best (and does very well indeed), which is explaining evolutionary biology.
2007-11-23 00:10:35 · answer #2 · answered by za 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Wonderful! I like the flying spaghettimonster that created all spaghetti in the world. Not every religion is the same, in fact most religions in the world do not have one God. Sometimes several gods, sometimes no God. Every religion is created out of despair and ignorance, and is used to put people down.
2007-11-23 00:26:50 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
It's interesting and to the point dear....
2007-11-23 02:50:00 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋