If you can prove what you are saying, and show that there were no students present, then you have an excellent defense.
Just out of curiosity. Was the J walker a student?.
2007-11-22 15:02:30
·
answer #1
·
answered by CGIV76 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
If you weren't going to the school you might have a chance, but knowing that there should be children present makes your chances of video proof pretty unlikely - especially since you would have only evidence from one other day and the judge accepting statistical (10 days) seems small even if you happened to have the time to collect it.
A picture of the sign might prove something because I don't think it is a proper statement of the law. It should say something like "25 mph from 7:30 to 9:00 am, 3:00 to 4:00 pm when children are present." Oklahoma enforces school speed limits all day on any designated school day and you better know those from elsewhere, not just because children are present. If Calif. has the sloppy law, then lack of children present or the police swearing that children were present becomes a factor. If you have a preliminary hearing thing, make sure everyone who should be there is and if they aren't, ask the case be dismissed. I once paid a fine and learned later that the failure of the complaining official to be there with pictures, so I could see what I was up against, was enough to throw the case out (not traffic in this case.)
2007-11-22 15:05:47
·
answer #2
·
answered by Mike1942f 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
Vehicle Code section 22352 provides that the prima facie 25 mph speed limit applies ONLY 1) while children are going to or leaving the school, AND 2) during school hours. (It also applies during school hours if the grounds are not separated from the street by a fence or other barrier while the grounds are in use.) If you can show that this was NOT during school hours, then that limit will not apply. (Otherwise, how do you know that jaywalker was not a student?)
However, that does not mean that your 45 mph was proper. CA uses the basic speed law, requiring any speed to be safe and prudent for the circumstances. One question, then, will be what limit applies on that street when school is NOT in session. If that is 45 mph or higher, you may have a good case.
2007-11-26 09:08:34
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
This sounds so familiar as my mother works in a school and got the same kind of ticket.
I would say pay the fine and let it be..Honestly, when driving near ANY school, you should drive very slow (students oresent or not). I wouldn't fight it - You will end up feeling like a complete jerk in front of the judge.
I'm sure you weren't driving like and idiot and only doing the same as others at the time but 45 near a school zone is a hard defense.
I used to be a speed demon but have learned to take it slow, let others cut in front of me and be pretty laid back on the road.
Slow it sown....people really do get killed - We have 3 fatalities in my town a few weeks ago - similar scenerio. Seemed like "no ones fault...but people got killed. Big mess.
Good luck and my best advise it to allow yourself more time in the morning. You'll be more relaxed and drive slower
2007-11-22 15:01:37
·
answer #4
·
answered by selery222 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
All school is still considered in session until 30min after and 30min before the bell rings. You should go to court. You have to be prepared for what you want to say. Take pictures of the sign and the street names. If you show up and so does the officer you have to be prepared. If the officer doesn't show up you are let off the hook.
2007-11-22 15:20:22
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
It depends on how much you passed the speed limit and since it was a school zone they might charge you more because you could have hurt the kids.
2016-05-25 01:47:26
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
In Australia, there are set times when the speed changes (eg 8am to 9:30am and 2pm to 4pm).
If it is "when children are present", sounds too vague to police.
If they force the issue, and say in court there was a child, Child is not children. - They can't get angry at you if they have not given clear instructions.
(One child you can keep an eye on, more is harder. Is that the reason behind the wording of the law?)
2007-11-22 15:08:31
·
answer #7
·
answered by wizebloke 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
no you do need to be aware of what your doing if you hit someone doing 45mph you could kill them
How would you feel if you killed a child
or how would you feel if your child was killed by someone speeding in a school zone.
you have to realize that you are controlling thousands of pounds worth of metal barreling down the road with no apparent idea where your at
2007-11-22 15:01:49
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Then fight the ticket, and really, would it hurt to drive slower, especially in a school zone, child present or not.
2007-11-22 15:03:31
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Not sure about California, but here in Oregon when a school zone is marked "...when children are present" it means when there are crossing guards present at crosswalks.
2007-11-22 14:59:43
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋