In answer to the question - is Darwinism fit to survive?

Question

Never mind all the twisted logic, if you believe you believe, if you don't, you don't. If your beliefs happen not to be true then we face the consequences.

Anyway why does the idea of a God - a complex eternal being strike anyone as a logical answer to anything. It simply removes the question back into the realm of mystery. It is no more satisfactory then postulating that Star Wars is real.

The only logical position is agnosticism, nobody really KNOWS, one way or another.

In the meantime please stop pushing the technology of evolution in the form of GM food on a world unwilling to fall under the control of Monsanto.

America's problems with evolution stem from the split between the primitive Christianity of the Pilgrams and the Enlightenment inspired founders of the constitution, here in the UK no one cares a monkeys about evolution.. it's a dead issue. Only fundamentalist Muslims or primitive Christians care about it. Anyway there's loads of other theories that also make religion l

Answer 1

Evolution is not a religion, so to compare the two is ridiculous. It is the most widely accepted scientific theory about the origin of life, and it's not going to change any time soon.

Answer 2

"In claiming that species evolved from one another, Darwinists never realize that not a single piece of evidence to confirm this has ever been obtained from the fossil record."

If that was the case why would the theory have been formulated in the first place? Because somebody had nothing better to do one Saturday afternoon, perhaps?


"Darwinists never realize that the chances of a functional protein forming by chance are 1 in 10950."

Actually it is much larger than that. More like 10^20 to 1. But evolution doesn't claim to explain the origin of life, even though some of its more enthusiastic supports make the claim on its behalf. Does that fact prove the literal truth of Genesis? No.

Answer 3

Wow. I'm not exactly sure what the question is, but being all in favour of science and technology, and also believing in God, I feel I would like to put my view across.
When I think about the big bang theory, and that it is accepted scientific fact, I think this science is pretty clever stuff.
But when I try to imagine that once there was no space, therefore no time or matter or energy, and then suddenly in an instant a universe was created, I think that's pretty clever too.

Answer 4

Evolution is scientific fact, proven abundantly in rock strata worldwide. Which should be of NO concern to any reaonably-intelligent religious folks -- since an omnipotent and omniscient God would have had no problem creating the evolutionary process right along with the rest of the universe.

Answer 5

You're saying the logical choice is being a whiny, wishy washy fence sitter? Either something exists, or it doesn't, all the evidence, or the lack thereof, point to..........doesn't, so unless you can prove otherwise, my decision remains.


"One might be asked "How can you prove that a god does not exist?" One can only reply that it is scarcely necessary to disprove what has never been proved." - David A. Spitz

Answer 6

Is Darwinism fit to survive? No! Why?
Beacuse of this

In claiming that a dinosaur grew wings while trying to catch flies, Darwinists never realize that the fly already had a perfect wing and flight system with the ability to flap its wings 1,000 times per second

Darwinists never realize that the atoms they claim gave rise to all life on Earth are in fact unconscious entities

In claiming that species evolved from one another, Darwinists never realize that not a single piece of evidence to confirm this has ever been obtained from the fossil record.

Darwinists never realize that the chances of a functional protein forming by chance are 1 in 10950.

and so much more

Darwinism is a perfect myth

Answer 7

I think the answer lies in both evolutionism and creationism.
Something had to set us on the path of evolution, which is, undeniably, a fact. Whether it was luck, or God, or something else that you believe in.

I believe that God set us on this Earth, not as we are, but as microorganisms, and set us on the path to become what we are today.

Answer 8

I think it is true most people in the UK are not interested in evolution. It's happened so it's happened so why worry about it. However I think most people are not bothered about religion either.

Answer 9

agnostic here! well - kinda!!

darwinism is FULL of holes but isn't perhaps as full of EVIL as organised religions,,,the problem, i think, lies in christians trying to use science to prove their beliefs and atheists trying to disprove religions - they just aren't the same languages!!!

u see the word 'truth' and think it means one thing but it DOESN'T - i can no more prove that my soul-mate is the only one for me than i can disprove the existence of a god...ANY god...doesn't mean they aren't true - just means we don't know how to think about these things well enough yet...or feel...people mistake the map for the territory, both in science and religion, but it seems like people are willing to kill for their religious beliefs more than scientists are willing to launch a pogrom against ignorance...still - the problem comes about when people think their theories about life are the same SORT of maps and can be compared. that's my tuppence worth anyway - off to offer some food to my gods and play with my tech' toys now. cya

=)

Answer 10

You are saying that you know the answer. If you know the answer then you can't be an agnostic.

If you were a true agnostic then you wouldn't object to others believing what they believe.

Since you aren't an agnostic, and you don't want to admit that to atheism then possibly faith scares you and that's why you choose not to say that you believe.