It's easier for me to believe that something happened to make our universe around us, than to believe something happened to make god AND then the universe around us.
2007-11-29 09:37:42
·
answer #1
·
answered by timbers 5
·
9⤊
0⤋
>Do you believe in a First Cause?
Not really. Believing in a 'first cause' immediately brings up the issue of what initially caused that cause. And if nothing caused it, as its own label implies, how and why did it happen? It makes more sense to believe that the Universe- or, if not the Universe, then some sort of Omniverse- has existed for what at least we humans would think of as eternity.
2007-11-22 08:28:47
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I dunno. To state there was a first cause suggests that time had a beginning and I'm not so sure that is the case. In fact, I tend to think otherwise. Time is man made and I am open to the possibility that 'All That Is' has always been ~ without beginning. I know things have changed, life in the universe for instance, but I don't believe, or necessarily disbelieve, that there was a first cause.
2007-11-22 14:41:43
·
answer #3
·
answered by Peace Yo 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
There were no "bits" that caused the big bang. What are you talking about?
2007-11-22 08:43:47
·
answer #4
·
answered by mannzaformulaone 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Every reaction having an equal and opposite....? An object at rest tends to stay....etc? Tis a good matter for speculation until you throw God in the mix. Then of course God is the First Cause, an argument that brooks no further debate. Kind of akin too "I know it is true because it says so in the Bible. How do you know the Bible is true? Because it's the word of God. How do you know the Bible is the word of God? Because it says so in the Bible."
2007-11-22 10:55:42
·
answer #5
·
answered by Matt E 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
Yes.
Did you know a Catholic priest, Georges Lemaître, proposed the theory of the Big Bang?
http://www.catholiceducation.org/articles/science/sc0022.html
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/aso/databank/entries/dp27bi.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georges_Lema%C3%AEtre
With love in Christ.
2007-11-29 07:41:57
·
answer #6
·
answered by imacatholic2 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. A first event, yes, first cause, no. One is not needed to account for the other.
2007-11-22 08:21:57
·
answer #7
·
answered by Avondrow 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Could it be that something (however little it was) always existed, like Christians claim God did?
A theory that "God just exists" is no more likely than a theory that "nature just exists."
2007-11-22 08:19:38
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Who knows? Where did God come from?
Need a haircut?
Try Occams razor!
2007-11-22 08:19:30
·
answer #9
·
answered by mam2121 4
·
4⤊
0⤋
yes, but what was the zeroth cause that caused the first cause?
2007-11-22 08:27:10
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋