English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Such as turning Europa's or Titan's oceans into wine or displaying a chariot of fire on the surface of Mars, or even some scripture (scrolls) on a comet.....heck, some nice cross on the moon....

Why, if he knew we would one day reach those places, didn't he leave some signs like those he's supposedly left here on Earth?

2007-11-22 06:41:10 · 16 answers · asked by Lex Fok B.M.F. 3 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

And please, don't tell me that "those planets are living proof of the existence of God"...

I'm talking here about clear examples, like those Christians claim he's shown (the Ten Commandments tablets or Moses' staff turning into a snake, not "baby smiles" or "the beauty of a sunset")

2007-11-22 06:43:31 · update #1

16 answers

What would be the point. Many people refuse to see the signs He put here on Earth.

2007-11-22 06:52:23 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 5 2

If you don't believe in God in the first place, what good would a cross (or anything else) on the moon do for you? Search enough geological formations from up high and you will find just about every 'symbol' there is. Two planes intersect, a cross: two rocks lying on top of one another: a star of david, the obscuring of the moon every month, the crescent.

If all that's seperating you from believing in God is a chariot of fire on Mars, then your belief isn't all that strong to begin with, which means not even it raining 40 days and nights would convince you. That's not an attack, its just a statement of fact. A cloud is just a cloud to someone glancing at it, but its a jumbo jet or a huge elephant to a child gazing at it dreamily: which is it?

2007-11-22 06:55:31 · answer #2 · answered by Khnopff71 7 · 0 1

it truly is an argument of momentum and length - the purely reason something variations route in area is because a rigidity is utilized (no air drag, etc.) as below Newton's guidelines of action. yet a planet or large moon has a lot momentum (mass circumstances velocity) it can take a very large rigidity to modify route. yet asteroids will be disturbed by passing comets and through operating into one yet another. a number of them are in completely solid orbits that each once in a lengthy time period, dozens or 1000's of years, placed them close to Mars or Earth and modify their route sufficient that the subsequent time the go the asteroid belt and disturb others. And it truly is completely a chance to have some go into orbit round us, even if the Earth-Moon blend is amazingly large and it truly is puzzling to locate an orbit it truly is solid. different planet's moons are a lot smaller in percentage to their host.

2016-10-24 22:24:44 · answer #3 · answered by brandea 4 · 0 0

Maybe the fact that htere isn't stuff anywhere alse shows that we are special to him. Why the heck whould he want to put stuff in other places. If we can't believe the stuff we have here, why would we believe it if it came from somewhere else? Somehow, someone would find a way to prove it may have been a random malfulfunction of something, or aliens, or whatever, because if you don't want to believe, you'll find ways not to. So maybe that's why God didn't deem it neccessary to little the universe with little prizes for us to discover. There's no point, and we have enough symbols here to keep us busy all eternity.

2007-11-22 06:55:44 · answer #4 · answered by peanut 1 · 0 1

So much for the ecclesiastical stance of the church that the sun revolves around the earth - Too bad Galeleo had to be killed for the error of the can't make an error holy papacy

Funny how they still talk about the infalability of the Pope and then leave that out

My point is that the moon itself and us being on it proves that the bible and the church lied again - or were wrong
Opps

I suppose the moon was supposed to be off limits

Sort of the cosmic pay no attention to the man behind the curtain

2007-11-22 08:33:23 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

His sign is in the sun and the moon which are symbolic of his two covenants. The Torah is guided by the moon and its followers (Judaism) are convinced that the light of the Torah is the true light from God. They completely reject Jesus and the giving of the second covenant.

Jesus came into the world saying, " I am the true light of the world...." His apostle Paul pointed out that the light of the Torah was simply a reflection of the true light meant to lead us to Jesus and the light of the new covenant. Science has proven that the light of the moon is simply a reflection of the true light of the sun just as the light of the Torah is a reflection of the true light of the Gospel.

The true light of the new covenant also acknowledges that the light of the Torah remains in place to rule over those who walk in darkness. Understanding eclipses helps to understand what the relationship between the Gospel and the Torah should be in pure worship and what the result of an unscriptural imbalance between the two will bring.

The great thing is that the Jews carried the Torah from the time of its giving and reject the gospel even though my claim is supported in part by Zechariah's vision found in the prophets, especially when it is understood with John's vision.

Zechariah 4 and Revelation 11: 3 - 4

Their blindness has served mankind in many ways....I believe the opening of their eyes will be the return to pure worship. Pagan Rome confused christianity by forcing the worship of the sun and the son as though they were one and the same.

All creation testifies that he is God, but it is meant to lead us to this understanding and not to be worsipped as though creation itself were God.

2007-11-22 07:34:12 · answer #6 · answered by Guardian 3 · 0 2

according to a prediction by Joseph Smith quite a few years ago.. there are men who live to be a thousand years old living on the moon and they wear black suits and black shoes with silver buckles ( puritan styled clothing ) and they are ten feet tall. My grandmother used to be a mormon.. ( her body is buried now ) i can still remember how excited she said she was for the "proof" that the prophet of Mormonism was correct when she tells the story about when america landed on the moon. She was to say the least..extremely disappointed and quit that church immediately. It would be interesting now to ask a Mormon what their church teaches about the prediction and the moon landing.

2007-11-22 07:28:25 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

The very existence of those objects is evidence of His existence. Why leave additional signs?
Oops, read the second part.
Like others said, would it matter. Some people would still try to explain things away as some kind of evolved or eroded natural phenomenon

2007-11-22 06:51:33 · answer #8 · answered by TopPotts 7 · 2 2

Maybe, and this is a HUGE maybe... but there may in fact have never been a god to perform such tasks. Although, if there is a god, it probably decided to just sit back, like an observer. Maybe.

2007-11-22 06:50:21 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

Maybe because he gave us this Earth to live on and enjoy and didn't find a reason to put it on any where else.

2007-11-23 05:37:58 · answer #10 · answered by Art 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers