Scott states in his new book that Scooter didn't do it , he just lied to protect president Bush & V.P.Chenne + 4 other High ranking white house officials . Would this explain why Bush made sure Scooter didn't sit one day of his prison sentence? NO Matter what Bush & Chenne;s reasons,should they be risking the life of an under cover CIA agent, at a time of war,, when she was gathering info? Scott has been very loyal to bush and has no reason to lie about some thing as serious as accusing the President And V P of being TRAITORS while our troops are fighting and dieing,,or "Worse" ! If this is true they are all guilty of treason! You cant blow the cover of an CIA Agent just to punish her husband for writing reports that "there are no WMDs in Iraq" He was just doing his job as Honestly as he knew how, If Bush/Chenne did do this at a time of war ,,does this make them Traitors? if so, What will/should be done?
2007-11-21 19:01:33 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Military
To John -Gal, I think Kerry is just stupid ,but,,, that doesn't excuse what he did , What I believe Dick Chenne did ,intentionally outing a Federal agent was deliberate and without regaurd for the life of an agent in the field. Scott said that Bush knew about it, and the "buck" stops with him. He is the first to invoke the "Patriotic duty" doctrine when he wants something.
2007-11-22 02:11:14 · update #1
Funny, the CIA denied Plame as ever being on the payroll, much less being an "agent." And it was her husband who after having been "relieved" by Bush created the stink. Suppose maybe, just maybe someone had/has an axe to grind? Time to get a grip and move on. You can't continue to blame someone else (Bush) for all of your life's failures. Time to grow up and own some of it.
2007-11-21 19:21:54 · answer #1 · answered by Doc 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You're behind the times and you didn't see the obvious. McClellan's (not him) Publisher said that McClellen said that Bush/Cheney knew. McClellan (himself) is saying that Bush didn't lie about the Plame incident. I caught this when the story first broke. McClellan's Publisher, not McClellan said that.
Are you going to sign up to arrest John Kerry? In a video from a few years ago a CIA official was describing an operation. An undercover operative was identified as "Agent Smith" and repeatedly called him by that nom de guerre. John Kerry having the documents in front of him kept calling the agent by his real name and thus outed him. Kerry is either very stupid or a traitor right?
2007-11-22 09:44:17 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Good Grief man, can we go on with life?Bush ain't running for president this time,dig up something on someone else and we will see if it makes a difference.
What does this question have to do with our safety in the future?We need to worry about the wimps that are running now, not what happened so long ago.And last month now is to long ago.
2007-11-22 03:13:44 · answer #3 · answered by Ronboy 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Could it also be stated that some people will say most anything just to sell a book? He stands to make a fortune selling this book because so many want blame Bush and Cheney for everything.
2007-11-22 06:02:37 · answer #4 · answered by doctdon 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Oh my, how much proof do you need, why isn't anything being done? Your guess is as good as mine, but you and I and the whole USA knows Bush is a traitor.
2007-11-22 03:12:16 · answer #5 · answered by Girly Q 4 · 2⤊ 2⤋
it's a little late to be bringing it up now, therefore i say he's full of sh**. if he knew this he should have spoke up during the investigation of the leak and trail of a innocent man.
2007-11-22 10:40:45 · answer #6 · answered by darrell m 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Except for people with preconceived convictions, most intelligent people don't accept as gospel truth everything they read.
2007-11-22 03:09:58 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Funny, I asked how Bush bots were going to smear this guy, my guess was disgruntled employee who was out to make a buck.
Nice to see how predictable they are.
http://ca.answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AhX0KMCuTe8oWFro7n3rGqnAFQx.;_ylv=3?qid=20071121084732AAXSW8i
2007-11-22 11:24:59 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
If he has proof then he should hae someone else bring it forward, cuz he will be "dealt with" if he does it himself.
2007-11-22 03:05:01 · answer #9 · answered by mac_byaah 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Who didn't think that before he "spoke" out? Really?
Oh, Republicans.
2007-11-22 03:07:45 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋