...embraced by "Young Earth Creationism"?
2007-11-21 15:06:11 · 10 answers · asked by Dog 4 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
lol! OK Tab. You got me.
2007-11-21 15:14:38 · update #1
I've never heard of Old Earth Creationism before today. I thought Intelligent Design was the new window dressing for Creationism.
I guess we'll never see the end of people disguising religion as science. Ironic that it's the religious side of the argument that will say anything to persuade people to their point of view. Seems like they'd prefer the moral high ground.
2007-11-21 15:14:56 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
It's an attempt to accept scientific findings without giving up the entire 'special creation' concept. Hey, at least they're trying.
2007-11-21 15:09:09 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
No, not at all.
It is an attempt to make evolution's old earth theory seem palatable to creationists.
2007-11-21 15:14:11 · answer #3 · answered by Bobby Jim 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
This know that in the last days perilous times shall come , for men shall be lovers of themselves , covetous ,
boasters , proud , blasphemers , disobedient to parents , unthankful , unholy , without natural affection ,
trucebreakers , false accusers , incontinent , fierce , despisers of those that are good , traitors , heady ,
high-minded , lovers of pleasures more than lovers of God , having a form of godliness but denying the power
of it ; from such turn away . For this of this sort are they who creep into houses and lead captive silly women
laden with sins , led away with various lusts , ever learning and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth
2007-11-21 15:12:59 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
They are trying to account for the dinosaur bones.
2007-11-21 15:08:32 · answer #5 · answered by Peter D 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
They are trying to make the Bible and science coincide. So far, they've failed miserably.
2007-11-21 17:43:20 · answer #6 · answered by Bookworm 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Think of it as death spasms for an idea that's lived long past it's time...
2007-11-21 15:12:48 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
yes, but its a pathetic attempt
2007-11-21 15:08:58 · answer #8 · answered by PD 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Sit. Stay.
2007-11-21 15:08:59 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
No. It's a poor attempt to marry the truth of the Bible with the error of pop "science".
2007-11-21 15:09:54 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 9⤋