Huh?
2007-11-21 09:24:50
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
no, because Jesus had brothers and sisters
Matthew 13:55: "Is not this the carpenter's son? is not his mother called Mary? and his brethren, James, and Joses, and Simon, and Judas?"
Matthew 27:56: "Among which was Mary Magdalene, and Mary the mother of James and Joses, and the mother of Zebedee's children."
2007-11-21 09:27:07
·
answer #2
·
answered by grandfather raven 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I assume that you mean she only gave birth and never naturally conceived through intercourse. Mary was only a virgin for the birth of her first child, Jesus. Her other children were conceived through the normal marital embrace, so therefore "her parts" worked "both"ways.
2007-11-21 09:26:46
·
answer #3
·
answered by enamel 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. Virtue has many rewards. But be willing to be measured by what you give not by what you take. Selfishness is the root of all evil in my opinion.
2007-11-21 09:26:29
·
answer #4
·
answered by J D 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Another example of a dumb question.
2007-11-21 09:26:02
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
That's really nasty.
And yes.
2007-11-21 09:26:47
·
answer #6
·
answered by benthic_man 6
·
0⤊
0⤋