Now I wouldn't think it offensive. In fact the 'kin' part is rather clever.
But as a child 'adopt', 'adopted', 'adoption' were all very loaded words to me because I always hated being adopted. I know it's spun as being 'chosen', but I was always ashamed of it.
Besides, unlike animals, pumpkins aren't BORN. They're grown. And even when I see 'puppies for adoption' signs, it has always implied leftovers no one wants.
I know it wasn't meant to be offensive, but I guarantee there was a little adoptee at that school who was a bit hurt or embarrased by it.
2007-11-21 12:05:11
·
answer #1
·
answered by Sunny 7
·
8⤊
1⤋
"The Jerk-offs". OH, this got here from a film, Nick and Norah's Playlist which was once the identify of a band. Michael Cera performs Nick. so, whilst you requested approximately a humorous, offensive identify, this got here to brain.
2016-09-05 11:19:12
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
i took no offense to it, but then i'm not adopted, i'm a first mom. i don't know how an adoptee might take it.
in reading the other answers, i'd have to say that "Sunny" put it really well. she opened my eyes and believe me, i'm not for the adoption and all the propaganda they put out to use and abuse women like myself when we are vulnerable. if it hurt one person's feelings, then that was one to many. this was a great question for adoptees, in particular, and i think we got our answer.
Sunny - you are not a leftover. best wishes.
2007-11-21 14:43:06
·
answer #3
·
answered by (!)listen 5
·
6⤊
1⤋
I personally don't find it offensive, and agree with most others that it was just someone's attempt at being cute.
That being said, if someone does find it offensive, I would use this as an opportunity to talk to the preschool and educate them about adoption. I believe the more that we educate the people around us about things, the better off we all are.
2007-11-21 11:40:16
·
answer #4
·
answered by BPD Wife 6
·
1⤊
4⤋
I don't think anyone was trying to be offensive. I mean growing up i saw adopt this or adopt that signs. I didn't take it personally. Considering it is a school though, i would think they would be more careful. In this day and age you have to be so political correct.
2007-11-21 09:21:38
·
answer #5
·
answered by a healing adoptee 4
·
3⤊
3⤋
I guess someone was trying to be clever. I don't recoil because I think it is offensive. I recoil because it is clumsy and cloddish. Makes me wonder about the quality of college education in the US (assuming that this was in the US).
It is fun to have semi-serious questions from time to time. Nice of you to ask!
2007-11-21 11:11:45
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
1⤋
Not offensive to me.
Here's the definition of "adopt" - means more than just adopting children.
1. to choose or take as one's own; make one's own by selection or assent: to adopt a nickname.
2. to take and rear (the child of other parents) as one's own child, specifically by a formal legal act.
3. to take or receive into any kind of new relationship: to adopt a person as a protégé.
4. to select as a basic or required textbook or series of textbooks in a course.
5. to vote to accept: The House adopted the report.
6. to accept or act in accordance with (a plan, principle, etc.).
—Verb phrase7. adopt out, to place (a child) for adoption: The institution may keep a child or adopt it out.
2007-11-21 09:13:31
·
answer #7
·
answered by sharkyincanada 6
·
1⤊
3⤋
Well, I'll go against the grain and say I don't like it.
Yes, we DO use the term adopt to mean other things, as in adopt a bill in parliament, or whatever. But in this case, the person making the sign is playing on the word adoption, and specifically playing on it's meaning as in to adopt a child.
I think it's tacky, and it's confusing to little kids. It makes adoption sound temporary, not permanent.
The only time I don't mind when people use the term adoption this way is in regard to pets. I hope that when people adopt a pet, it is meant to be permanent - or it should be. You really are responsible for that living creature, and it should be a promise to take care of it forever. No, it's not like a child, but it is a member of the family and a permanent commitment.
2007-11-21 09:26:13
·
answer #8
·
answered by LJ 7
·
1⤊
7⤋
No, it's not offensive. The term 'adopt' is not exclusive to adopting children. I think it's a cute way for whoever grew those pumpkins to try to unload them.
2007-11-21 09:12:51
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
4⤋
No, I don't think it's offensive. Adopt is just a word.
People adopt attitudes, highways, family's (to give presents to around the holiday's), pets, trees, and apparently pumpkins....none are offensive in my opinion.
2007-11-21 12:06:22
·
answer #10
·
answered by . 4
·
2⤊
5⤋