without studying both sides of the issue and all that each issue represents within its own structure so as to be enlightened to its claims, how can you say what you really know on the subject or give a view fairly without equal portions to both sides in acquiring information? Without this aren't you just spouting misinformed, half baked notions? And woudn't that make 75% of the posters here just basing information on heresay over the years and half tibits of information to form their thoughts on? Outside of those who have study religion and its interpretations it seems like a lot of hot air flying around here.
2007-11-21 05:50:49 · 4 answers · asked by TTC 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
******In fairness this could also be applied to believers who spout with 1/2 the information and the other half assumption******
2007-11-21 05:51:44 · update #1
sheloves: now that I can respect and understand
2007-11-21 05:57:44 · update #2
(((Dr. Zapp))) that's all I am looking for, the possiblity that many blow hot air on here....lol
2007-11-21 06:14:07 · update #3
As a psychologist I am structured under the 'null hypothesis' which disallows any formal conclusion to be reached without considered research and experimentation from all and every available source. As for a personal opinion on your question I would in a small capacity agree that there appears to be a large majority of posters from all aspects of belief/non-belief who qualify for your 'assumption'.
(((TTC)))
2007-11-21 06:07:03 · answer #1 · answered by Zappster (Deep Thunker) 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
We have regularly refused to make use of bank cards. We dont have any and by no means will. Simply in view that we are living via th philosohy that if you happen to dont have the cash to shop for it correct now, what makes persons feel they're going to have the cash later to pay the financial institution again. If you desire whatever. Save up for it. We are typically you across the a while of 30-35. I see alot of persons, utilizing credit playing cards and most likely marvel what for. Is it the reality they ant the whole thing now, instantaneously. Rather than doing the difficult paintings and saving up for it. People say..........."oh however we've got the bank card only for emergencies" Well my reaction to that's fairly with ease.........If you ought to depend on an individual else simply in case of an emergency, its now not precisely being very independant is it. It so convenient to NOT have a bank card and simply retailer for what you desire. Whether its that new vehicle , or vacation, christmas looking and so on. Save and while you do come to be shopping it, it feels all of the extra larger in view that you already know you dont owe cash it. Your query used to be what is a suitable debt, headquartered on revenue ratio, brushing aside what you could owe on a loan. My reply is No Debt in any respect. If you dont have the cash to pay for it now. Then you are not able to come up with the money for it and dont assume to have the cash in long run both to pay it again. Only option to have the cash is retailer for it. Banks will dermis you alive for each greenback you received. They will nail you down so badly, that you're going to be oweing them cash for the leisure of your lifestyles. Its now not valued at it. Saving is the larger choice to shop for matters. Even whether it is whatever you MUST have correct now. A intelligent man or woman could plan forward and assume the price, have the cash already stored.
2016-09-05 11:09:02 · answer #2 · answered by brickman 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
My problem is the assumption that something is an "issue." IE Creationism vs Evolution. Educated people know that evolution is a fact regardless of faith.
2007-11-21 05:54:56 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Unfortunately, most.
2007-11-21 06:18:08 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋