Some people seem to think that they will do severe damage to their health if they skip even one or two meals, and the conventional wisdom seems to be that skipping meals is a bad idea, and that a complete zero-calorie fast is life-threatening, even if it's only for a few days. However, I have been searching articles in the so-called "prestigious peer-reviewed medical journals," and I find almost no cases of any bad effects of fasting lasting up to 30 days and even longer. Does anybody know of any real evidence (or personal experiences) of any harm done by total fasts of up to 30 days? Please be specific.
2007-11-20
18:40:51
·
2 answers
·
asked by
Jim
5
in
Science & Mathematics
➔ Medicine
In the medical literature, there are hundreds of reports of studies of long-term fasts, involving many thousands of patients. The studies consistently show that the patients lost weight, improved their diabetes control, improved rheumatoid arthritis, lowered their cholesterol, felt better, had a better attitude and even scored better on mental aptitude tests. Those results don't sound bad to me. I would like to know of even one case of even one person suffering any harm from a water-only fast of less than 30 days.
2007-11-20
18:51:54 ·
update #1
Okay, here is my evidence for the benefits of long-term fasting, taken from peer-reviewed medical journals:
http://fastingdiet.blogspot.com/2007/11/are-total-zero-calorie-fasts-safe.html
Anybody that disagrees, where's your evidence?
2007-11-20
19:03:33 ·
update #2