I never see imacatholic2 ask or answer questions. The profile leads me to a heap of questions imacatholic2 has answered but when I search the page there are no responses displayed from this account.
Is this a bot?
If so why the word "catholic" in the name and what is the purpose in having a bot on this board? Other boards have real members as top contributors.
Just curious. No biggie. Well. Actually, having a specific religion in the name of a bot that represents an all inclusive R&S board is a biggie ~ to me. Alright. More than curious.
2007-11-20 13:27:42 · 13 answers · asked by Peace Yo 4 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
No.
I am not a robot. I cannot make misteaks. Nothing can go wrong, go wrong, go wrong, go wrong, go wrong, ...
Just kidding.
But if I cannot prove a simple thing like God exists then how can I prove that I am not a robot?
I answer an average of twenty questions a day. How many do I need to answer to be considered a "real member"?
With love in Christ.
2007-11-20 15:15:35 · answer #1 · answered by imacatholic2 7 · 7⤊ 0⤋
He/she does have responses, but the reason for the totals, is likely because he/she has been posting for a long time. And perhaps has fans who vote. However, if he/she defends the multitudinous errors of Romans Catholicism, then such answers can not be among the best but sadly would be among the the worst.
See http://www.christiantruth.com/
http://www.aomin.org/Roman.html
http://www.geocities.com/Heartland/Plains/2594/
http://peacebyjesus.witnesstoday.org/papalpresumption.html
(1 John 5:13) "These things have I written unto you that believe on the name of the Son of God; that ye may know that ye have eternal life, and that ye may believe on the name of the Son of God."
2007-11-20 13:45:59 · answer #2 · answered by www.peacebyjesus 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
She's 'real' and is very thoughtful and religiously aware and educated in her beliefs. She only answers what shes knowledgeable about, and just with a "yes, no i don't know" or insult type question.
I think she deserves to be among the top contributors.
--Buddhist.
2007-11-20 13:38:15 · answer #3 · answered by ✡ 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I have wondered this myself. I routinely encounter the top answerers below imacatholic2, but never imacatholic.
2007-11-20 13:31:38 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Never seen a post or question by that person either, and its high time we started a rebellion and placed the top contributor as a non-christian!
2007-11-20 13:36:21 · answer #5 · answered by <Sweet-Innocence> 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
She's real. She answers catholic questions mostly. I see her every once in a while. She's choosy about which questions she answers. You don't get to the top for nothing.
2007-11-20 13:58:34 · answer #6 · answered by Ten Commandments 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
maybe he's taking a break now that he is top answerer
2007-11-20 13:34:24 · answer #7 · answered by ? 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I don't really exist either.
I'm not sure about Achtung.
2007-11-20 13:31:12 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
interesting observation Maybe he changes his name back and forth .
2007-11-20 13:40:44 · answer #9 · answered by dogpatch USA 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Your pic scares me, dude, you need a better one, why not a rock star, playa?
2007-11-20 13:30:29 · answer #10 · answered by freekin 5 · 0⤊ 3⤋