DENVER (AP) — The Colorado Supreme Court cleared the way Tuesday for an anti-abortion group to collect signatures for a ballot measure that would define a fertilized egg as a person.
The morning after pill is available all over the US so who could tell if it ever hap-paned?
2007-11-20 13:27:17 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
I want that fertilized egg to start paying taxes!
2007-11-20 13:32:54 · answer #1 · answered by bete noire Carpe Noctum 5 · 7⤊ 2⤋
Good If I was a pro -life person that's exactly how I would do it if I believed that abortion was in fact murder- which means that you need a legal human being first
I think that we the people should demand that the anti-abortion group who brought this suit do a complete legal cascade effect and make sure that what they had in mind is properly carried out every single logical step of the way because at the end of that cascade ,the anti -abortion folks will cease to be a viable political force in America
The Cascade
That every mis-carriage that ever occurs anywhere requires that a complete homicide investigation be done before murder can be ruled out, Failure to report such an event is a felony .
That should an abortion be performed or attempted to be performed that all persons who are participants in it shall be subjected to any and all applicable penalties that apply to their individual level of involvement
That pre-existing motherhood and number of living children cannot be taken into consideration at sentencing
Let's do that and see what happens when we start to execute mothers and placing their living children in foster homes.
If anybody wants to add anything to my list go ahead
2007-11-20 22:30:13 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
This from the state that legalized abortion before Roe, before California, and before New York. Of course, it was also before a bunch of fundamentalists moved to Stepford Springs and turned it into a miniature Saudi Arabia for Christians.
(Not that it'll pass, but it might be close!)
2007-11-20 21:31:34 · answer #3 · answered by STFU Dude 6 · 5⤊ 2⤋
I don't think a person should be allowed to vote pro-life unless they are registered foster parents considering they are the ones who want to dump more children into an already failing system.
An egg, fertilized or not, is NOT a human life.
2007-11-20 21:30:40 · answer #4 · answered by alana 5 · 9⤊ 3⤋
I heard about this. In fact, someone asked a question about it earlier.
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=Aq5TxETRnGtlOcNX2FFXQzPty6IX;_ylv=3?qid=20071115045252AANfH6I&show=7#profile-info-Azdg9KKwaa
I think the proposal is lacking in all scientific credibility.
If it passed, they would use it to ban the morning after pill.
2007-11-20 21:56:14 · answer #5 · answered by kriosalysia 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
When Christians have adopted every child languishing in an orphanage, then they will have earned the right to preach about pro-life.
2007-11-20 21:33:49 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 2⤋
This depends on individuals perception on the ethical values and the society one is brought up.Abortion is better before the embryo gets life.
2007-11-20 22:46:47 · answer #7 · answered by TARBA 3 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Well i be damned . Hmmm , I will have to think about the point you brought up.
2007-11-20 21:40:23 · answer #8 · answered by swindled 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it should be legal to have an abortion.would it be better to kill something that could feel or to bring a unwanted baby into a world with a mother who couldnt care for it and probably a father who couldnt either.
2007-11-20 21:32:28 · answer #9 · answered by millertime 2 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Good then they can go to the IVF clinics and adopt EVERY SINGLE one of those eggs. Tell them to let me know just how that turns out for them.
2007-11-20 21:30:46 · answer #10 · answered by ~Heathen Princess~ 7 · 6⤊ 3⤋