The most moral thing is the deterrence of nuclear war. How we do that is Mutual Assured Destruction (MAD) and limiting the amount of countries that have nuclear weapons. I was a B52 pilot in the US Air Force. My one plane was designed to deliver nuclear weapons all over the world. If I were to have taken off loaded to the maximum with nuclear weapons, I would have personally been the largest single mass murderer in the history of the world. However, both the USSR and Red China and the USA knew that if one or the other started a nuclear war there would be no winners, only losers. Deterrence is the only sane and moral action when it comes to nuclear weapons.
2007-11-21 15:02:14
·
answer #1
·
answered by ? 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
In my opinion Yes because nothing in it is immoral. I would rather have it (MAD) as a deterrence then have countries start using them on each other. I guess everyone couldhave nuclear weapons and hide them until some one attacked them and then they could surprise them but that would really be immoral I guess.
2007-11-20 13:43:15
·
answer #2
·
answered by GunnyC 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
No!
Nothing about nuclear devastation is moral.
We need to go back to clubs and stones, and put the pain back in war, and there won't be as many!
Let the rich do their own fighting, and the officers put on the front lines, generals first, politicians next.
2007-11-20 15:48:41
·
answer #3
·
answered by hangarrat 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
Do you know how to speak Russian? Chinese?
Didn't think so.
Your Welcome
SSG US Army 73-82
2007-11-20 13:29:47
·
answer #4
·
answered by Stand-up philosopher. It's good to be the King 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
As opposed to the alternative; using the weapons?
2007-11-20 13:32:29
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Not if that means invading a country, killing thousands of civilians in the name of 'removing weapons of mass destruction'.
There are other ways to accomplish this.
2007-11-20 13:29:36
·
answer #6
·
answered by blurry_6_9 2
·
0⤊
2⤋
Is self-defense moral?
2007-11-20 13:24:12
·
answer #7
·
answered by RTO Trainer 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Yes@
2016-05-24 09:38:06
·
answer #8
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Is it just me or does this question not make sense?
2007-11-21 15:22:22
·
answer #9
·
answered by maozSFCU 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, it kills too many innocent people. If we use it then what will stop others from using it on us ?
2007-11-20 13:24:47
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋