wouldn't it be better not to pick a best answer until a day or two has past, instead of just an hour or two?
2007-11-20 08:19:44 · 11 answers · asked by His eyes are like flames 6 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Wouldn't it be best if people actually chose a best answer instead of having everyone's answers languish in voting & never get voted on?
(And, yes, I agree with your initial statement. :) )
2007-11-20 08:23:04 · answer #1 · answered by Pooty Pootwell 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
You have to wait at least 4 hours. Most of the time after the first few minutes your question is pushed off the front page and it is rare to get any more answers after that. . .sometimes. . .but not often.
Most of the time I wait a day or so because I forget. : )
2007-11-20 16:22:26 · answer #2 · answered by sparkles9 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
well its four hours and.. no i don't think it would matter. After about 30 min the question is so buried that no one cares any more
2007-11-20 16:23:05 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, I want to choose best answer immediately, but it makes me wait 4 frickin' hours!
2007-11-20 16:23:38 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I think so. I like to see how many different opions I get before making a decision.
2007-11-20 16:22:48 · answer #5 · answered by Dr Doolittle 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
not if your friends give you the answer you're looking for right away.
face it. best answer is not about a "best" answer. it's about who agrees with you and kisses your tushie...
2007-11-20 16:23:50 · answer #6 · answered by chieko 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You know, I think you do have a point! Here, have a star!
2007-11-20 16:25:30 · answer #7 · answered by Marie 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
agree with first answer! totally who cares!
2007-11-20 16:25:41 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, but some are in a hurry to do it.
2007-11-21 00:56:15 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
they get buried though so i wait 7 hrs thats enough.
2007-11-20 16:24:27 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋